Minimize

Welcome!

Syria?

Big Al
June 17, 2013

Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show

Discussion
40 Comments
    Jun 17, 2013 17:31 AM

    I believe a radical Islamic Marxist president, who does not appear to care about the US, will do whatever he feels is most likely to produce an islamic Syria.

    Jun 17, 2013 17:46 AM

    Sunni, of course.

    Jun 17, 2013 17:36 PM

    This is not about religion. We need to consider wider perspectives regarding who (and what allies) have reasons to be in the Mediterranean. The current push will deprive Russia of it’s only port access there and end Fourty years of irritation to Mid East countries that have extensively acquired and sport Russian made missiles, rockets and related hardware of war. There is no other excuse for them to float war ships in the region if Syria or the coming new Syrian government refuses them access. Strategically this will also result in them being denied freedom of use of the entire Southern fleet which will henceforth remain essentially locked in the Black Sea, unable to justify even use of the Suez. The end of heavy arms shipments into the region will be effectively cut off except by land which is considerably more difficult to accomplish under cover and easier to track where missiles are concerned. Excluding Russian ships means that anytime in the future they attempt to float equipment in the area will be seen as an act of hostility and will draw deep suspicions. As it stands they are currently enabled via their longstanding alliance with Syria to come and go as they please without drawing criticism even though it is well known that their ships bristle with eavesdropping hardware and have nuclear capabilities. It is very convenient actually that a civil war in Syria looks like it will result in Russian expulsion. Perhaps the administration has seen fit to give the rebels a helping hand and a little extra push to make it all happen.

      Jun 17, 2013 17:15 PM

      Russia is not the old USSR anymore. The US is now acting like the old USSR, both here in the United States & around the world. This country loves to sell weapons to everybody, and I believe is the largest supplier in the world right now. America is doing the work of its special interests of our Banksters buddies, the Rothschilds Banking Cartel, in wanting to crave out all those opposed to it Banking practices anywhere the Bank of England feels threatened, this foreign policy decision has come about from without any oversight from Congress or its people, from someone who thinks he`s above the Law of the land. This is dangeous road to take from just one man decision over the objections from what other Presidents would have done with dealing with nuclear powers such as Russia & China. Those such as Harry S. Truman with confict with N. Korea & its neighbor and ally China, during the Korean War.

      Jun 17, 2013 17:51 PM

      Futher insanity is Obama`s use of NDAA here in America http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-demands-court-uphold-his-right-to-ignore-constitution/ Obama Demands Court Uphold His “Right“ To Ignore Constitution. > Check this out: Under terms of the Act, Obama had been given exclusive authority to direct members of the US military to arrest and imprison anyone he believes to have “substantially supported“ al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or “associated forces.“ >> He`s setting himself up to be arrested under his own rules as brought out by this law that he himself signed into law by himself alone. Goes to show his great legal mind at work. That by the way he obtained from Columbia University, that the faculty itself can`t remember they ever saw him there ever…. More unanswered questions about the Ghost of Columbia…… Judge Forest that brought about the injunction because the Act provisions do not apply to American citizens living in the US. …… As to what has been reported on the news lately that the Obama`s are out of the country in Africa. ….. Makes one think that his remarks and his buddies Sen. John McCain and the rest of the neo-cons could like wise be arrested for engaging with known terrorists abroad.

        Jun 18, 2013 18:34 PM

        I put this above comment worded a bit different on Rand Paul`s facebook site friends section, now its being pursued by Alex Jones` Infowars.com article, and another news blog is running with it, the internet can be useful in a pinch….

        Dennis……just had time to read…..great post and comment,,,,as I was reading I thought ,,,,,”Obama is going to set him self up to be arrested,,,,,funny …..,
        As they say…..will be caught in his own disseat………

      Jun 17, 2013 17:08 PM

      Another interesting tid bit of information about that last article `Obama demands court uphold his “right“ to ignore Constitution` …… `And when asked by the judge what is meant to be an “associated force“, Obama`s lawyers “… claimed the right to refrain from offering any clear definition of [the] term, or clear boundaries of the president`s power under [the] law.“ In short, it is the federal government`s scheme that the Act remain so vague that a corrupt and power-hungry Administration may imprison virtually anyone it considers a threat to its pursuit of absolute power.`

        Jun 18, 2013 18:39 PM

        Again put this comment on Rand Paul`s facebook site, and of course Alex Jones from Infowars blog is running with it, along with another news blog, as Herman Munster would say neat-oh……

        the morons,,,,should do some reading on history,,,everytime that happens , it back fires…………,,,,the corrupt, get out done by the corrupt,,,,,gang vs. gang……

    Jun 17, 2013 17:37 PM

    The “chemical weapons” narrative is garbage, like “weapons of mass destruction” and “nuclear enrichment” before it. Al-CIAda has operated in the region for years. It is important to cut through authorized narratives.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-16/mystery-sponsor-weapons-and-money-syrian-rebels-revealed

      Jun 17, 2013 17:42 PM

      I agree completely.

        Jun 17, 2013 17:57 PM

        Lore is right. I also agree. see my comment below.

    Obama……most likely opened his desk drawer , and discovered a note from BUSH/ Chaney……IT reads,,,”who ever reads this note , and is next in command, you are hereby directed to attack one of the countries on this list….., if , it is checked off, means we have already eliminated that country, and you may proceed with the remainder. Best,,signed, RONNIE,GEORGE, BILL, GEORGE,

      Jun 17, 2013 17:54 PM

      Amusing Jerry, but not too far off the mark. Do you recall George W Bush’s State of the Union address in 2002? In that he described the “Axis of Evil” as consisting of Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Several months later Undersecretary of State John Bolton gave a speech that expanded that original list to include Libya, Syria and Cuba as states that sponsored terrorism or were “rogues” on the global stage. The script has not varied in those dozen years since and one by one each of the countries is being dealt with. So yes, there is a clear program that has been established for well over a decade based on the public comments and speeches back in 02 that defined who were America’s enemies. The Axis of Evil speech was an early warning of what was too come and we should always keep it in mind. Since then Cuba has been emasculated and no doubt this is substantially an outcome of the departure of its leader, Fidel Castro while Iraq has been invaded twice and Muammar Gaddafi of Libya has been deposed. Syria is merely next on the list and you can rest assured the outcome will not be favorable for Bashar al Assad as the machinery has been in the works to remove him since those famous speeches were uttered and proclaimed back in 2002. Hopefully this historical refresher will help some of you understand better what is now transpiring. What we need to appreciate is that Iran remains on the list and will probably be the next target after Syria leaving only North Korea to be dealt with in the far distant future. The program is already written and has not varied to date. You can be certain it will be followed as time progresses and if you really want to worry you should look out to the future and try to understand how the West will be pitted against the East in one of the most serious showdowns of our generation as the last target remaining finally comes across the radar.

        bird…..hope you enjoyed…………thanks……………

        Jun 17, 2013 17:10 PM

        Good post. Documents like PNAC and Clean Break will be remembered as landmarks on the road to ruin.

    Jun 17, 2013 17:07 PM

    Bird Man,
    I have followed your posts because I want to hear from both sides of the equation. I understand that you are a gold bear at this point in time. My question to you is: At what point in time do you see gold trending up again and will it be dependent on an event such as the collapse of the bond market. Thanks to all who contribute both pro and con precious metals.

      Jun 17, 2013 17:26 PM

      Good question Gator Man. I have a central belief that Silver has gone parabolic already and so given that condition it seems obvious to me that it must retrace the parabolic run at a bare minimum (plus an overshoot) before new power will build in the PM sector. Bob Farrell’s rule #2 therefore applies to my philosophy where he writes “Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction”. I would however agree that this is still under debate though and that the 56% decline to date MIGHT still be a correction within the longer term rise. The future is unwritten of course and even I would agree that we are nearing a stage when the PM markets could see a reversal in fortunes. I would like to see silver fall below 20 bucks first if I am to have confidence it has retraced the past move and thus suggests the next leg up can begin.

      PS: I am not a gold bear……I am a gold mercenary because I don’t care which way it moves as long as I catch the right direction.

    Jun 17, 2013 17:49 PM

    Could it be that Al Qaeda is the Central Bankers muscle?
    Below is a paragraph from a weekend post on topic with this discussion:

    The same people who killed Kaddafi killed the ambassador and three others. Obama was just as motivated to arm the Syrian rebels then as he is admittedly today. It seems Obama and his State Department have a perfect record of siding with the Islamic religious extreme in their opposition of the secular. Think failure to support Iranian secular protest in 09, support of religious backed rebellion in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Syria. A perfect consistency of supporting those aligned with those who we went to war against in Iraq and Afghanistan. Could it be that the Libyan ambassador was involved in a Ollie North-esque arms deal? But why speculate Obama distanced himself from Presidential responsibility by going to bed. Obama was trying to vote present during a violent outburst directly resulting from the aftermath of a war he started. Four people died. At least two of the dead died several hours after Obama was aware of the conflict with the Calvary more than not in sight….the Calvary was ordered to stand down. This was the scandal.

    Jun 17, 2013 17:57 PM

    My take is The US is being drawn into this war once again to defend Israel’s interests, with the Iranians sending 4000 troops to help Assad it won’t be long before they come into conflict with The Americans after all they are on opposite sides and it could lead to direct US confrontation with Iran. DT

    the best way to resolve this conflict , is for Obama to invite the new leader of Iran, to go with him and Michelle on a shopping trip to N.Y.CITY and a tour of the White House,that should only cost about $60 million……and as a departure gift,send him back coach….via. Detroit, and let him pick out a house and a lot….free of charge.., that way we can keep track of him, since, we can make him a US citizen, and tell him that he can run for President of the USA, because he will not need a birth certificate…….

      Jun 17, 2013 17:27 PM

      Hi Jerry, you are right of course but you are too rational in your thinking for our irrational leaders. DT

        Yes, Dick you are correct,,,,,How, would they bill us for the NON war..,,,it would only save us $3billion,,,but, then, how would the congress make any money.., Why, would we need them, they would be out of a job….and might have to give up their retirement funds of $100,000 a year……………

      Jun 18, 2013 18:09 AM

      It’s a brief window of opportunity that I fear they’ll decline to use. Too many other agendas at work.

    Jun 17, 2013 17:23 PM

    This war reminds me of the lead up to the First World War when the Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated at Sarajevo, the players are big power brokers and for any of them to back down would mean ridicule for them in the eyes of the world and this time they will not want to lose face. DT

    Jun 18, 2013 18:12 PM

    US 4 star Brigadier General Wesley Clark explains the fix was in on Syria twelve years ago :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSNyPS0fXpU

    Jun 18, 2013 18:51 PM

    Found this the other day, Full NSA access built into every Windows OS since 1997, guess who`s watching it isn`t just Big Brother, its some Joe Blow that`s not even an intelligence agency dude, but your not so friendly business hacker out to rape your PC out of your/its Intellectual Property, all for a price it seems by no less than anybody…. http://revolutionradio:org/?p=52049

    Jun 19, 2013 19:16 AM

    That link above worked on my Facebook page, its Encrypt Key for access is different — http://therebel.org/stone/655776-full-nsa-access-built-into-every-windows-os-since-1997?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default

      thanks………It figures……..GATES LIKE BUFFITT works for the CARTEL……..

        if IT WAS not for IBM…..GATES WOULD BE NOTHING………

          MY NEXT COMPUTER WILL NOT BE MICROSOFT ,,,,everyone in my family has already switched to APPLE………..

            Jun 20, 2013 20:31 AM

            Remember, the Pirates of Silicon, the movie, both Gates and Apple creator were partners together, they were together at IBM, worked on their very first PC together, so don`t you think they may have collaborators together on this present scam together. It would explain why both of them became so rich so fast, insiders information works.

            Jun 20, 2013 20:33 AM

            OOOPS that`s `The Pirates of Silicon Valley` ….