Minimize

Welcome!

What is the overall direction of these markets?

September 21, 2015

On today’s market wrap the term directionless seems to sum up our team’s thoughts.

Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show

Discussion
36 Comments
    Sep 21, 2015 21:27 PM

    Al or Cory:

    You had Trader Vic on the weekend show. He mentioned he had a blog/website, but I’ll be darned if I can find it. Can you post a link?

    Thanks,
    Jim

      Sep 21, 2015 21:17 PM

      Hi Jim,

      This is the website that he uses to post his most recent interviews – http://www.victorsperandeo.com/

      His other website where he is a partner can be found here. It is more trading focused but I think you need to be a client. – http://eamlp.com
      I hope this helps!

        Sep 22, 2015 22:32 AM

        Great Market Wrap from everyone involved. We appreciate your daily insights!

          Sep 22, 2015 22:56 AM

          Miners turn to alternative finance to cut debt as downturn grinds on
          DENVER, SEPT 21 – BY NICOLE MORDANT

          http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/21/mining-denver-financing-idUSL1N11H1L620150921

            Sep 22, 2015 22:27 AM

            This is the last resort for miners. Selling their own flesh to feed. A lot of companies did it in late 90s and early 2000s. When price rose finally, they had to work for nothing. That was after 20 years bear market and now it is only a few years they are already broke.

            Sep 22, 2015 22:09 AM

            Yes, agreed Lawrence. It shows the underlying debt burden of even some of the larger mining companies with the low metal pricing. Here’s another sign of the times…..
            _________________________________________________________________
            Metal Rout Tempts Silver Wheaton With $5 Billion Streaming Feast
            by Danielle Bochove
            September 21, 2015

            http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-21/silver-wheaton-pursuing-5-billion-in-deals-globally-ceo-says

            Sep 22, 2015 22:28 AM

            Thanks. I remember some of silver Wheaton’s stream deals had to be dissolved or changed otherwise the companies could not survive. With mining cost keeps going up due to monetary easing, in the next few years, the current stream deals will choke the miners to death. Then the predators like SLW will end up with the mining properties only (after the bank left over, doubt how much). It will be brutal in the next few years. The returning of streaming is the end of road.

        Sep 22, 2015 22:04 AM

        Thanks Cory

    Sep 21, 2015 21:05 PM

    A very impt & prescient article by Adam Hamilton

    Fed’s Vast Gold/SPX Impact
    Adam Hamilton September 18, 2015 3058 Words

    Yesterday’s Fed decision was one of the most anticipated ever, with much potential to really change the global financial-market dynamics going forward. But thanks to the Fed’s incredible market distortions of recent years, Fed meetings spawning exceptional volatility is nothing new. Fed decisions’ impacts on gold and stocks have been vast. And this next tightening cycle should reverse their Fed-imparted directionality.

    Before we get started, a big caveat is necessary. While this essay was published the morning after that Fed decision, I had no choice but to research and write this draft before yesterday’s momentous 2pm event! Producing one of these weekly essays takes a lot of time and effort, and even after writing 670 of them there was no possible way to start this process after the Fed and still make the publishing deadline.

    That presented a challenging quandary, as the Fed’s decision and surrounding posture is all anyone is interested in this weekend. I’ll discuss the specifics of everything the Fed did and said in great depth, as well as the resulting market impact and outlook, in Tuesday’s Zeal Speculator weekly newsletter. But leading into that hyper-anticipated event, I wanted to do some background research on the Fed’s market impact.

    The elite group within the Federal Reserve that actually makes the monetary-policy decisions is the Federal Open Market Committee. The FOMC includes ten voting members, and is led by the Fed Chair Janet Yellen herself. Four other members are from the Fed’s Board of Governors, while the remaining five are regional Fed presidents. The New York Fed has a permanent seat, while the four others rotate annually.

    No other ten men and women in the world wield such enormous power over the fortunes of economies and markets, which is why investors and speculators are forced to so closely follow the Fed. The FOMC meets 8 times per year for monetary-policy-setting purposes, about every 6 weeks or so. These meetings usually wrap up on Wednesdays with a statement outlining their decision published at 2pm New York time.

    Every other meeting is followed by a press conference by the chairman. The FOMC usually saves major policy changes for that half of its meetings, since they give it an opportunity to explain its actions and calm down traders. The press-conference-followed meetings also include a summary of the economic and interest-rate projections of the ten FOMC members as well as the remaining regional Fed presidents.

    As a lifelong speculator and student of the markets, I anticipate Fed days with great interest and dread. Volatility is what makes the markets fascinating and tradable, and the FOMC spawns big market moves in spades. But the anxiety comes from volatility being a sharp double-edged sword. When you get stuck on the wrong side of a trade after an FOMC decision, it’s certainly painful to weather the resulting tumult.

    As I’ve thought intently about yesterday’s epic Fed decision in recent weeks, I wanted to gain a better grasp of the outsized impact of recent years’ FOMC decisions on the two main markets I trade. They are gold and the stock markets. So this week I went through and analyzed the gold and stock-market action as represented by the flagship S&P 500 stock index immediately after ever FOMC decision since early 2013.

    I certainly remember many volatile Fed days and their immediate aftermaths, but I was surprised at just how ubiquitous extreme FOMC-sparked volatility has been! Starting at every 2pm FOMC decision, I looked at those trading days and the couple immediately following. In both gold and the stock markets, any single-day or several-day move beyond 1% is noteworthy. So I analyzed all net moves exceeding that.

    Amazingly I found the results a bit shocking. Since I trade and write newsletters for a living, I am very blessed to watch the markets all day every day. So I not only lived through all 21 FOMC decisions since early 2013 in real-time, but I wrote about them extensively in our following weekly and monthly newsletters. So I remember all kinds of Fed-spawned volatility, but all those Fed days blend together to mask their magnitude.

    This first chart looks at the SPX and gold since early 2013. That date is important because that’s when the Fed’s wildly-unprecedented open-ended third quantitative-easing campaign ramped up to full speed. QE3 has radically distorted global markets, spawning an extraordinary stock-market levitation that all but obliterated demand for alternative investments led by gold. The Fed has utterly dominated recent years.

    The FOMC’s decisions, along with the associated Fed-official jawboning and resulting psychology among traders, have been the overwhelmingly-dominant driver of gold and stock markets since early 2013. The Fed’s actions eclipse all secondary drivers combined by an order of magnitude, they are truly the entire market story since early 2013. There’s never been another market era where the Fed had more influence!

    So every FOMC decision in this surreal span is marked with a yellow line. And starting the trading day of each 2pm FOMC-statement release, and continuing for the following two trading days, any outsized reactions above 1% net are noted in gold and the SPX. Once again even after experiencing all of these events at a deep professional level, I was surprised at their potency and consistency considered as a whole.

    The outsized gold and stock-market reactions immediately following FOMC meetings were so common that this chart got busier than I expected. Let’s start on the stock-market side since the Fed’s QE3-driven stock-market levitation has dominated sentiment in all markets. Of the 21 FOMC meetings before this week’s since early 2013, fully 13 or 62% saw outsized stock-market reactions as seen in the benchmark SPX.

    And a whopping 10 or 77% of these were positive, with the SPX rallying on the Fed day, the Fed day and the subsequent trading day, or the Fed day and the next two trading days. The average gain after an FOMC decision on these upside reactions was 1.6% within several trading days including the Fed day. This further illustrates how the Fed has bent over backwards to appease stock traders since early 2013.

    The SPX experienced two massive reactions to FOMC days in recent years, which I define as monster 3%+ moves off an FOMC decision within that 3-trading-day span including the Fed day. The first was a huge 3.9% loss the stock markets suffered after the FOMC’s mid-June-2013 meeting. While the Fed didn’t act that day, Ben Bernanke chose his post-meeting press conference to drop a bombshell on the markets.

    That day he simply laid out a best-case scenario, a hypothetical timeline, of when the Fed might start to taper its QE3 bond-monetization purchases later that year. The resulting violent downward reaction of the stock markets on the mere hint of less-aggressive extreme Fed easing is a damning indictment of the artificial nature of stock markets’ QE3-driven rally. Without the Fed, recent years’ surge never would’ve happened!

    The second massive reaction of the stock markets to an FOMC decision came with the SPX’s colossal 4.5% gain after the mid-December 2014 meeting. Provocatively that wasn’t a highly-anticipated Fed day, with the FOMC expected to do nothing but remove two words from its statement. It had promised a “considerable time” between the end of QE3’s bond buying and the first interest rate hike since June 2006.

    But when the FOMC released its statement with the dovish “considerable time” still in there, computers parsed it instantly and went on a bidding frenzy. That day and the next, the SPX rocketed 4.5% higher on traders’ view that the Fed was still backstopping the stock markets! The FOMC was afraid of rocking the boat with the stock markets so lofty, and traders took advantage of this to recklessly flood back into stocks.

    Both statistically and visually in this chart, there’s no doubt that FOMC meetings during recent years’ period of the most-extraordinary easing in the Fed’s history have proved very bullish for stock markets. The SPX not only surged in an outsized fashion far more often than not after FOMC decisions, but it often climbed to major new secular highs soon after the Fed spoke. The Fed literally levitated the stock markets!

    This overwhelmingly-upside SPX behavior during the latest years of the Fed’s extreme easing has very ominous implications for the Fed’s first tightening cycle in over 9 years. If the uber-dovish FOMC decisions and jawboning in recent years was so darned bullish for stocks, odds are stellar that the Fed starting to unwind its record easing is going to be bearish. Indeed higher rates hurt stock markets in a variety of ways.

    Directly they make yields on new bonds relatively more attractive, enticing investors back out of dividend-paying stocks into bonds. This puts lots of selling pressure on stock markets. But higher rates have a big indirect impact too. They slow the overall US economy by raising debt-service costs, weighing on national consumption which soon translates into lower corporate sales and profits. That’s a big problem.

    Lower earnings make already-overvalued stock markets look even more expensive, catalyzing more selling. So just as the most-easy Fed ever seen provided a monumental tailwind for the stock markets in recent years, a new tightening cycle shifts that to a major stock headwind. Investors and speculators alike need to realize a Fed-levitated stock market won’t fare well as the punch bowl is finally taken away.

    As the only major asset class that generally moves contrary to stock markets, gold suffered the opposite fate in the Fed’s record zero-interest-rate-policy-and-quantitative-easing-fueled market anomaly of recent years. With the Fed choosing to effectively backstop stock markets, investors pulled vast sums out of other assets to deploy into the strong stocks. Gold was the major casualty of this mass exodus.

    The FOMC meetings’ impact on gold in recent years was vastly greater than their impact on stocks. Gold saw outsized moves immediately after fully 16 of the 21 FOMC meetings before this week’s, or 76%! And the impact was overwhelmingly bearish and negative, with 12 of those 16 meetings seeing losses over 1% in the immediate aftermath of FOMC decisions. And gold’s losses far exceeded the SPX’s gains.

    Gold plunged 2.6% on average on the Fed day, the Fed day and the subsequent trading day, or the Fed day and the next couple trading days! That’s a really big move. And an amazing 6 of these 16 episodes where gold reacted strongly right after FOMC decisions exceeded that 3% threshold necessary to qualify as massive moves. The biggest one was gold’s astounding 6.4% two-trading-day plunge in June 2013.

    Once again that was that same FOMC meeting followed by Bernanke’s press conference where he very carefully laid out the possibility that the Fed would start reducing the size of its mammoth monthly bond monetizations. The prospect of less monetary inflation led gold to promptly collapse. Before that fateful Fed-conjured distortion changed everything, gold had held strong around $1375 to $1425 for a couple months.

    Gold had suffered a panic-grade selloff back in mid-April that year after a major secular support zone failed. Gold sentiment was damaged, but psychologically traders could’ve rebounded from a single extreme selling event. But the subsequent plunge on that June-2013 QE3-taper-scare FOMC meeting drove the final nail into the coffin of gold sentiment. It was that Fed event that led gold to become hated to this very day.

    The really sad part was that reaction was ridiculously absurd! The FOMC first announced QE3 back at its mid-September-2012 meeting, and subsequently expanded it to full steam shortly later at that year’s December meeting. Gold shot up 1.9% the day of that first meeting to $1766 on the Fed promising to create more money out of thin air to buy bonds, pure inflation. And after the second, it was still way up at $1712.

    The day before that June-2013 QE3-taper-scare meeting, gold was at $1368. So not only had this metal not rallied at all during QE3, it had fallen 23% over that timeframe where the Fed’s balance sheet had ballooned from $2779b to $3418b. Gold had paradoxically lost 23% over the same short span where the Fed’s inflation had grown its balance sheet 23%! If gold didn’t rally in QE3, why should it reverse on QE3 ending?

    Anyway, the overall impact on gold during the Fed’s extraordinary easing of recent years was powerfully negative. Even though record-low interest rates and currency created out of thin air to monetize bonds are super-bullish for gold historically all over the world, gold was crushed by FOMC dovishness in the last few years. Why? The Fed was actively enticing money out of everything else to chase levitating stocks.

    So just as a tightening cycle is going to reverse the Fed’s massive upside impact in stock markets, it is also going to reverse the Fed’s massive downside impact in gold. Today with gold bearishness universal, traders all assume the next Fed tightening cycle is going to doom gold. Gold yields nothing, so higher rates leave it far less competitive. The problem is market history thoroughly refutes this popular argument.

    A couple weeks ago, I published the results of my comprehensive study on how gold fared in every Fed-rate-hike cycle since 1971. It not only rallied through 6 of those 11 cycles, performing better the bigger and longer the rate-hike cycle, but saw massive average gains of 61% in these exact Fed-rate-hike cycle spans! Gold soared 50% higher during the Fed’s last rate-hike cycle between June 2004 and June 2006.

    Even though the Fed more than quintupled its federal-funds rate from 1.00% to 5.25% over that span, making bond yields far more attractive, gold surged. Why? Because higher rates really damage stocks and existing bonds, renewing investors’ demand for prudent portfolio diversification through gold. Fed-rate-hike cycles have proven very bullish for gold historically, especially when gold is low going into one.

    And no matter what Yellen said yesterday, the initial rate hike is merely the first step on the long road to normalization. This last chart looks at the Fed’s balance sheet and federal-funds rate over the past 35 years or so. The full normalization of the Fed’s extreme zero-interest-rate policy and quantitative-easing campaigns is going to take many years, it’s not a trivial little one-hike-and-done scenario like widely hoped.

    The epic once-in-a-century stock panic in 2008, the first in the Federal Reserve’s entire history, changed everything. The Fed panicked, implementing both ZIRP and QE. In the 25 years before that panic, the federal-funds rate averaged 5.5%. Returning to there is what a full normalization entails on the rate side. At a quarter point per hike, it would take 22 rate hikes to restore the FFR to its modern historical norms!

    And that’s not impossible or even improbable. Between June 2004 and June 2006, the Fed hiked by a quarter point 17 FOMC meetings in a row to bring the FFR back near its historical average. So don’t take this one-and-done nonsense seriously, a rate-hike cycle is not a one-time event. And the Fed hasn’t even started unwinding its gargantuan bond purchases yet, as its exploding balance sheet indicates!

    If the Fed hadn’t panicked and implemented QE in response to that stock panic after ZIRP burned all its conventional monetary-policy ammunition, a normal growth trajectory would have taken the Fed’s balance sheet up near $1.2t today. Yet thanks to QE it’s a staggering $4.4t! So the Fed somehow has to sell, or more likely roll off, $3.2t in bonds before we will know how this extreme monetary experiment turned out.

    Make no mistake friends, the fat lady hasn’t sung on the extreme Fed policies since late 2008 until rates and the Fed’s balance sheet are fully normalized! The ultimate impact of both ZIRP and QE in both the markets and economies won’t be known until they are fully unwound. So no matter what gold and the stock markets are doing in the immediate aftermath of this latest FOMC decision, it’s only the tiniest start.

    Since this extraordinary Fed-easing era was so friendly to stocks and hostile to gold, its unwinding is almost certain to bring about the exact opposite outcome. Rising rates, and the threat of more rate hikes for years to come, will weigh on lofty overvalued Fed-levitated stock markets. And as stock markets suffer, capital will return to gold. Investors and speculators ought to sell stocks and buy gold to ride this.

    The easiest way is through their leading ETFs, the SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF for the stock markets and the GLD SPDR Gold Shares ETF for gold. For investors who want far more bang for their buck in gold upside potential, check out the left-for-dead gold miners. These companies are all trading down near fundamentally-absurd price levels today not reflecting their quite-profitable operations even at today’s gold prices.

    As the extreme Fed distortions of recent years start to unwind, it’s incredibly important to cultivate a great source of contrarian information. That’s what we’ve long specialized in at Zeal. We publish acclaimed weekly and monthly newsletters for speculators and investors. They draw on our decades of exceptional market experience, knowledge, and wisdom to explain what’s going on in the markets, why, and how to trade them with specific stocks.

    With recent years’ record Fed tailwinds for the stock markets shifting to headwinds, we face a starkly different investment landscape going forward. Major mean-reversion reversals are inevitable in both stocks and gold, offering epic opportunities for contrarians. Capitalize on them! Since 2001, all 700 stock trades recommended in our newsletters have averaged annualized realized gains of +21.3%! Subscribe today, and get prepared to multiply your wealth!

    The bottom line is FOMC decisions have had vast impacts on both gold and stock markets in recent years, yesterday’s was nothing new. The Fed’s wildly-unprecedented zero-interest-rate policy and quantitative-easing debt-monetization campaigns provided a powerful tailwind for stocks, fueling an extraordinary stock-market levitation. FOMC decisions tended to reinforce this bullish Fed-conjured upside bias.

    Conversely gold was beaten to a pulp as the Fed seduced investors into forgetting prudent portfolio diversification. With the Fed shifting from record easing to a years-long tightening cycle, the fortunes of the markets are due to reverse. The stock markets are going to face a stiff headwind for years, forcing investors to diversify back into alternative investments led by gold. Is your portfolio ready for this monumental shift?

    Adam Hamilton, CPA September 18, 2015

      Sep 21, 2015 21:15 PM

      Bottom line is the best………..”forcing investors to diversify back into alternative investments led by gold.”

    Dan
    Sep 21, 2015 21:08 PM

    anyone know why Rye Patch Gold RPMGF was down 15% today??

    Sep 21, 2015 21:12 PM

    Frank.. I cannot agree… there is significant research for gold going higher w rising rates thats the best line,the best fact…

      Sep 21, 2015 21:14 PM

      Don’t make the mistake that rising rates would be bullish for gold, in the past rising rates have been to cool inflation or economic growth, there is no sign of either completely different rate hike cycle IF it happens

        Sep 21, 2015 21:26 PM

        Not true. Gold went up 25 times in the 1970s and rates were rising the entire time. Rates don’t rise “to” cool inflation. When you dump an interest bearing asset, do you do so because you want to cool inflation? I didn’t think so and neither does anyone else. We all assess the risks, reward, and opportunity costs associated with holding one asset over another. It is therefore safer to say that rates rise because the market anticipates inflation or greater opportunities/less risk in competing asset classes.

          Sep 22, 2015 22:49 AM

          Don’t put the cart before the horse. Rising rates are a feature of a credit expansion because investors bid-up capital when capital investment is appealing/rewarding. The interest rate is the price of capital that gets pushed higher with demand. Like all rising prices, the seeds of the next turn down are built-in (as Rick Rule says: the cure for high prices is high prices) but it’s simplistic to say that rising interest rates are negative for the economy since rising rates are a feature of every expansion.

        Sep 22, 2015 22:10 AM

        Absolutely right, jj

          Sep 22, 2015 22:19 AM

          I concur. This is a completely different kind of rate cycle environment and the rise is for different reasons. It is not to cool the economy but to return us to a more normal business cycle. But it does rely on inflation to be creeping up to work which is why I keep saying the Fed is waiting for commodities to put in their bottom. since the 50’s there has been a reasonably close correlation between rates and inflation that did not exist in the first half of the century. That is good evidence that the model the Fed relies upon for rate setting is indeed inflation sensitive (no matter what else they say). Have a look at the following chart to see what I mean and compare the period pre-1950 to what follows.

          INTEREST RATES & INFLATION: 1900 – 2014 — An Inconsistent Relationship Before The Liberating 1960s — Crestmont Research
          http://www.crestmontresearch.com/docs/i-rate-relationship.pdf

          Sep 22, 2015 22:18 AM

          The evidence is on my side boys.

            Sep 22, 2015 22:21 AM

            Stewart Thomson understands:

            “In my professional opinion, the Western gold community needs to stop cheering for deflationary QE and deflationary rate cuts, and start thanking Janet Yellen for her taper, and for her upcoming rate hikes.

            Those rate hikes will increase money supply velocity, cause inflation, and significantly boost gold prices.”

            http://www.321gold.com/editorials/thomson_s/thomson_s_092215.html

            Sep 22, 2015 22:51 AM

            Interesting point Matthew.

      Sep 22, 2015 22:12 AM

      Agatha……thanks for the reply. I will reexamine my comment. Best……OOTB

    Sep 21, 2015 21:55 PM

    I of course have no idea where gold/GDX are going.

    But, we do have a breakout, and Gary’s on to it. I myself am hoping/waiting for a pullback to enter. Don’t know if it will happen or not. But right now, GDX is on a BUY signal, have no doubt.

    Sep 21, 2015 21:29 PM

    I’m not a bull or bear regarding any sector Big Al, I trade what the market creates and for me its very simple when it comes to gold:

    All gold needs to do is close above $1142 then $1169 then $1188 then $1205 then $1232 then the bulls can focus on attacking major resistance at $1300 anything short of that and the past 4 years repeats again, SELL RALLIES and get SHORT

    Oct central bank action is going to create the trend into year end as the ECB and BOJ will be looking to devalue their currencies further and the US feds will/should pass again on a rate hike especially if we get BOJ Oct 7th making a move followed by ECB Oct 22nd which will again put pressure on the FOMC to back away from a rate rise as the $ will be heading higher off the BOJ,ECB action.

    As I was telling Doc, do we get a repeat of Oct 2014:

    Doc look up a chart of the S&P500 and $yen, if the BOJ in early Oct decides to go full on nuclear with their purchases then the S&P will rip higher, look at last Oct what happened with yen/s&p500 and gold as the BOJ added to its QE and pop went US equities down went Gold into the late Dec buy zone

    Sep 21, 2015 21:12 PM

    Donald Trump will be on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert tomorrow evening at 11:30 pm. EST. Colbert has not been kind to The Donald, he is a died in the wool Democrat but it should be interesting to watch because although he can’t abide Trumps success he is willing to interview him to boost his shows ratings.

    Trump on the other hand is playing the media to boost his fortunes, all in all for me it should be interesting to watch the tit for tat. DT

    Sep 22, 2015 22:15 AM

    High yield corporate bonds anyone? No thanks!
    http://schrts.co/HkJeAA

    Sep 22, 2015 22:46 AM

    I remember a Charlie Brown cartoon where Charlie is about to pitch and the word “BALK” appears in huge letters next to him. Charlie Brown balked.

    Janet Yellen balked, big time.

      Sep 22, 2015 22:17 AM

      Yellen…….needs to buy some BALKIN OIL……..Relube her thinking……….

    Sep 22, 2015 22:55 AM

    important levels here with gold and silver, gold was able to reach a key resistance level @ $1142 with its move off the Sept 14th buy signal, silver did not hit $15.55 a close below $1122 is not good nor silver below $14.95

    after first hour of trading it will most likely suggest selling long positions of jnug and nugt bought Sept 14th for less than 10% gains, so much for gold ripping higher!!!!! and the US$ crashing?

      Sep 22, 2015 22:59 AM

      AXU and TLT , .36 is proving again to be major resistance for TLT as its a sell again and AXU was a sell Monday with 50% gains from Sept 2nd buy level of .30

        Sep 22, 2015 22:36 AM

        don’t want to see a US$ close above 96.64 for all those calling for THE bottom in commodities (again)

    Sep 22, 2015 22:23 AM

    If Hillary is indeed physically sick as some articles are now suggesting and she still wants to become the next US president the only thing that is keeping her in the race is a giant ego.

    Sep 22, 2015 22:39 AM

    another flawed example from the goldbugs, money will flow into commodities, Oil, Silver, Gold as money leaves the US equity markets, really, I must be reading my charts upside down.

    Sep 22, 2015 22:55 AM

    wow even Stewart is following $Yen now, better late than never as a professional he’s missed 8 years of yen/gold dancing, yes gold will head higher if yen appreciates but it needs to happen first, just like raising rates suggesting the velocity of money at street level will expand, only if demand is there, Japan is a great example. No inflation from QE around the world so is it any wonder deflation is the correct outcome

    http://www.321gold.com/editorials/thomson_s/thomson_s_092215.html

    Sep 22, 2015 22:56 AM

    From Yao Yudong People’s Bank of China 2015-06-25:

    The World Needs New Reserve Currency: from the perspective of global liquidity

    http://www.graceland-updates.com/images/stories/15sep/2015sep22yao1.pdf

    Sep 22, 2015 22:00 AM

    accentuate the positive.

    Sep 22, 2015 22:28 AM

    its great to suggest higher US rates will create the bottom in gold lets face it these past 4 years everything else that was to propel gold higher has failed from Asian demand to China as the big buyer etc, etc oh and QE was to create hyperinflation in the US and crash the US$ remember, not!

    So to those now linging up behind the latest spin for higher gold its really simple take out these levels and then you maybe correct, of course you need the feds to start the rate hike cycle FIRST….golds hurdles:

    First close above $1142 then $1169 then $1188 then $1205 then $1232 then the bulls can focus on attacking major resistance at $1300 anything short of that and the past 4 years repeats again, SELL RALLIES and get SHORT