International Law re: Palestinians, thank you CFS

International Law

The most consistent and universal demand among advocates for justice in Israel/Palestine is that Israel should comply with international law. Therefore, to be effective, advocates will need some familiarity with international law and how it applies to issues in Israel/Palestine.

What is international law?

The modern history of international law begins in the 19th century, when the world community initiated treaties among many participating nations that set standards for acceptable behavior in times of war and other aspects of international relations. International law is usually understood to apply to relations between nations, rather than to private citizens or the laws that govern those citizens. However, some treaties, such as the Geneva Conventions, require that national laws conform to its regulations.

Much of international law is consent-based: a state is not obliged to obey the law in question, unless it has so consented. But some aspects of international law are considered to be binding on all states, such as “customary international law” and “peremptory norms.” The latter is also called “jus cogens,” (Latin for “compelling law”) and refers to fundamental principles of law that all states are expected and obliged to uphold.

Instruments of international law cited on Palestine Portal

Hague Convention II (1899)
Geneva Convention IV (1949)
Additional Protocols to Geneva Convention IV (1977)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Full (1966)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – Full (1966)
International Convention on Crime of Apartheid – Full (1973)

International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion, Separation Wall, 2004 – Summary
International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion 2004 – Full, English and French
UN Press Release – ICJ_Advisory Opinion_2004

United Nations Charter (1945)
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (1948)
UN Security Council Resolution 242 (1967)
UN Security Council Resolution 252 (1968)
UN Security Council Resolution 267 (1969)
UN Security Council Resolution 338 (1973)
UN Security Council Resolution 446 (1979)
UN Security Council Resolution 452 (1979)
UN Security Council Resolution 471 (1980)
UN Security Council Resolution 476 (1980)
UN Security Counctil Resolution 478 (1980)
UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016)

Other Resources

IMEU – PDF: Are the Palestinian Territories Occupied?
IMEU – PDF: Israel’s Blockade of Gaza: Is it Legal?
IMEU – PDF: The Right of Return and Palestinian Refugees
IMEU – PDF: Israel, Gaza, and International Law
BADIL – PDF: 1948 Palestinian Refugees and the Right of Return: International Law Analysis
Birzeit University Institute of Law – PDF: Advocating for Palestinian Rights in Conformity with International Law
ICAHD – PDF: International Law and House Demolitions
JADALIYYA  – PDF: Is Gaza Still Occupied and Why Does It Matter?
NAD – PDF: Claims Resolution Under International Law
OHCHR – Website: International Human Rights Law


Many aspects of Israeli treatment of Palestinians violate international law; in particular the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza entails numerous violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention which addresses the treatment and protection of civilians in times of war and conflict.

In 1999, the Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention reaffirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. Palestinians fall under the definition of “protected persons,” defined in Article 4 of the Fourth Geneva Convention: “Persons protected by the Convention are those who, at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a conflict or occupation, in the hands of a Party to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they are not nationals.”

Following is a brief, non-comprehensive review of the application of the Fourth Geneva Convention and other instruments of international law to some key issues in Israel/Palestine. Information for this article is derived from “Faith Under Occupation,” a publication by the World Council of Churches, the AFSC publication “Life Under Occupation,” and other sources. Palestine Portal welcomes recommendations for amendments and improvements for this subject:

Regarding Land Confiscation

 UN Security Council Resolution 242 (22 November 1967) calls upon Israel to withdraw its forces from land that it claimed during the 1967 war (the West Bank including East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights & the Sinai Peninsula), and the inadmissibility of acquisition of land by force.

According to Article 46, Hague Convention II, an occupying power cannot confiscate private property.

“Grave breaches…shall be…extensive destruction and appropriation of property which are not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.”
Geneva Convention IV, Article 147

Regarding Settlements

“The occupying power shall not deport or transfer members of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
Geneva Convention IV, Article 49

This means that colonization of occupied territory is prohibited. The occupying power cannot confiscate land in the occupied territory for the sole purpose of establishing settlements for its nationals.

In several resolutions, the UN Security Council has reminded Israel of this and described its settlement enterprise as a flagrant violation of international law.

Regarding Home Demolitions

Geneva Convention IV, Article 53 prohibits an occupying power from destroying any property unless it is absolutely necessary for military operations.

“Grave breaches…shall be…extensive destruction and appropriation of property which are not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.”
Geneva Convention IV, Article 147

Objects that are essential for the survival of the population (e.g. water cisterns and sewage systems) should not be attacked, destroyed, removed, or be rendered useless.
Additional Protocol I to Geneva Convention IV, Article 54

Regarding Forced Displacement

“Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.”
Geneva Convention IV, Article 49

Regarding Palestinian Refugees

UN Resolution 194, Article 11 (11 December 1948) resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live in peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible;

Geneva Convention IV, Article 49 prohibits individual or mass forcible transfers from an occupied territory to any other territory, occupied or not. Deportations outside the occupied territory and transfers within the occupied territory are identified as grave breaches.

“Everyone has the right to leave any country including his own and to return to his country.”
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 13

Regarding Water and Sanitation

“Access to safe water is a fundamental human need and therefore a basic human right.”
Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary General

On 2010, the UN Human Rights Council recognized the right to water and sanitation as human rights, as they are indispensable for the full enjoyment of the right to life, the right to health and the right to dignity. Under international humanitarian law, an occupying power is responsible for the welfare of the civilian population and must ensure that civilians are provided with or allowed to secure the basic needs and objects indispensable for their survival including food, water, medical supplies and shelter. Under the fourth Geneva Convention, Israel must ensure Palestinians’ access to drinking water, water for personal hygiene and sanitation (Articles 55 and 56, Geneva Convention IV).

Under international human rights and humanitarian law (HL), the occupied people have the right to their own natural resources. Under IHL, water, as a natural resource, is protected and should be preserved. Although the occupying power may use natural resources and enjoy its fruits (Article 55, Hague Convention II), the use and the extraction of water resource in an occupied territory may not be excessive, abusive, wasteful or neglectful. The occupying power should never damage or diminish the property itself. It may use natural resources as long as it is not detrimental to their capital and must not over exploit the resources. Furthermore, any use of water by the occupying power must be to cover the expenses of the occupation and/or for the benefit of the local population (which does not include settlers). It is prohibited to use the natural resources from an occupied territory for the enrichment of the occupying power and/or citizens and companies. Discrimination in the allocation of water resources is prohibited.

Regarding Food and Medical Care

To the fullest extent of the means available to it, the Occupying Power has the duty of ensuring the food and medical supplies of the population; it should, in particular, bring in the necessary foodstuffs, medical stores and other articles if the resources of the occupied territory are inadequate.
Geneva Convention IV, Article 55

Regarding Humanitarian Aid

If the whole or part of the population of an occupied territory is inadequately supplied, the Occupying Power shall agree to relief schemes on behalf of said population, and shall facilitate them by all the means at its disposal…All Contracting Parties shall permit the free passage of these consignments and guarantee their protection.
Geneva Convention IV, Article 59

Regarding Collective Punishment

“No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.”
Geneva Convention IV, Article 33

Regarding Jerusalem

UN Security Council Resolution 252 “declares invalid” Israel’s acts to unify Jerusalem as a Jewish capital, and UN Resolution 476  “reiterates” that Israel’s claims to East Jerusalem are “null and void.”

The 2004 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the Separation Wall reaffirms that legislative and administrative measures taken by Israel as the occupying power that have changed the status of Jerusalem are not valid since they violate international law.

According to international law, East Jerusalem is occupied territory. Land cannot be acquired by means of annexation, as the annexation by use of force is contrary to international law: Article 2(4), UN Charter.

See more on this subject in The Status of Jerusalem in International Law from the NAD.

Regarding Family Reunification

The family unit is protected in Article 46, Hague Convention II and Article 27, Geneva Convention IV. Civilians are at all times entitled to respect for their persons, honour, family rights, religious convictions, and manners and customs.

“The widest possible protection and assistance should be accorded to the family, which is the natural and fundamental group unit of society, particularly for its establishment and while it is responsible for the care and education of dependent children.”
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 10 (ratified by Israel in 1991).

Impediments of family reunification also violate the prohibition against forced transfer in Article 49, Geneva Convention IV, as it forces protected people outside the occupied territory.

Regarding The Separation Barrier

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) Ruling: (9 July 2004) issued an ‘Advisory Opinion’ stating that the wall built on West Bank land including East Jerusalem, is illegal. The Advisory opinion called for construction of it to be stopped immediately, due to its route which runs deep into the West Bank and East-Jerusalem. The Court related to the construction of the barrier as a policy as a policy that contributes to displacement, impeded the Palestinian right to self-determination and is “tantamount to annexation”, which is forbidden under international law.

Adding that the West Bank wall violates Palestinians’ right to freedom of movement as well as other human rights (rights to health, education, work, etc.), the court concluded that: “Israel is under an obligation to immediately terminate its breaches of international law; to cease the works of construction of the wall being built in the oPt including in and around East Jerusalem; to dismantle the structure placed; and to make reparation for all damages caused by the wall.”

Regarding Movement and Access

The right to freedom of movement provides that people are entitled to move freely within the borders of the state, to leave any country and to return to their country.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 13 and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 12

Movement is a prerequisite for accessing basic needs such as healthcare, education and government institutions; work places; maintaining social, cultural and family connections etc. Restrictions imposed by the Israeli government impact most aspects of Palestinian life and violate many of their basic rights and benefits under international law, such as the right to access medical services (Article 16 and 56 Geneva Convention IV), religious institutions (Article 27, Geneva Convention IV; Article 46 Hague Convention II), family members (Article 26 and 27, Geneva Convention IVArticle 46 Hague Convention II) and educational institutions (Article 50, Geneva Convention IV).

Regarding Freedom of Worship

Israel has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, which provides that “Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.”

Movement restrictions that impede access to religious institutions -and are not necessary for the maintenance of public order – infringe on the rights of the Palestinian population to freedom of religion and worship, according to Article 46, Hague Convention IIArticle 58, Geneva Convention IV, and Article 75, Additional Protocol I to Geneva Convention IV.

Regarding Respectul and Humane Treatment

“Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons, their honour, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs. They shall at all times be humanely treated, and shall be protected especially against all acts of violence or threats thereof and against insults and public curiosity.”
Geneva Convention IV, Article 27

Regarding Employment and Standard of Living

“Protected persons who, as a result of the war, have lost their gainful employment, shall be granted the opportunity to find paid employment…Where a Party to the conflict applies to a protected person methods of control which result in his being unable to support himself, and especially if such a person is prevented for reasons of security from finding paid employment on reasonable conditions, the said Party shall ensure his support and that of his dependents.”
Geneva Convention IV, Article 39

Palestine Portal provides information from diverse sources for educational purposes.
Views and opinions expressed in the material provided are not necessarily
those of Palestine Portal or of organizations in the Portal community.

Copyrighted materials on this site are provided in accordance with the “Fair Use” provision
of the Copyright Act of 1976, which allows for the use of copyrighted material
for purposes such as news reporting, criticism, and education.

  1. On February 3, 2020 at 8:01 am,
    irishtony says:

    Al / CFS…You shoud both know by now…Isreal does NOT RESPECT any laws.
    They see themselves ABOVE all laws.

    • On February 3, 2020 at 1:26 pm,
      Big Al says:

      Simplistically speaking, not referring to your intellect, that is partly true.

  2. On February 3, 2020 at 8:34 am,
    Ebolan says:
    • On February 3, 2020 at 9:21 am,
      Matthew says:

      The sheep can’t see that the push for electric/computer cars is about the globalist Marxist ongoing plan for more control. It has nothing to do with climate change or peak oil.

      I’d start looking to buy based on Cramer’s BS.

      • On February 3, 2020 at 9:30 am,
        Ebolan says:

        I tell you Matthew, that’s exactly right. ECs, climate change…all a huge scam the sheeple are swallowing hook, line and sinker. And scamsters like Elon are nothing but criminals making an unbelievable fortune off it.

      • On February 3, 2020 at 1:31 pm,
        Big Al says:

        Maybe not today but certainly as soon as sentiment changes. I agree with you about the comments of Mr. Cramer.

    • On February 3, 2020 at 1:28 pm,
      Big Al says:

      I see a major difference between tobacco and oil. One is a necessity and the other is definitely not except to those who are physically addicted.

  3. On February 3, 2020 at 10:07 am,
    cfs says:

    I kinda disagree to all three of you above:
    Irish. Israel has always sought to have defensible borders.
    You need to go to the Golan heights and look down and see that without that territory, Israel is indefensible. Israel gave back most of theterritory it took by pre-emptive war.
    Matthew, I agree that batteries are not sufficiently developed yet, but I see as necessary the start of electric vehicles necessary to get to the point where batteries are developed. Oil, gas and coal are limited and necessary for electricity production in the future and for air travel.
    As for climate change, I believe the climate physicists that invented global warming are incredibly ignorant and do not deserved to be called physicists.

    • On February 3, 2020 at 11:06 am,
      Matthew says:

      Yes, oil is so limited that it is 50%+ cheaper today (in real terms) than in the early 1920s despite the automobile being in its infancy back then and the billions of barrels consumed since.
      Physicists are brainwashed and/or dishonest just like countless others in all professions.

    • On February 3, 2020 at 1:33 pm,
      Big Al says:

      The concept of defensible borders, CFS, is the most important point that you made in your comment. It is a fact that I have to remember.

  4. On February 3, 2020 at 12:41 pm,
    cfs says:

    Production techniques have immensely improved, Matthew.
    Nevertheless oil and gas are finite resources.

    Unless new technologies are found for aircraft, we will need mined or synthetic fuels to exist a couple of generations from now, unless you’re predicting some kind of apocalypse.

    • On February 3, 2020 at 1:34 pm,
      Big Al says:

      I agree that your comment about “future demand” as being a critical issue.

    • On February 3, 2020 at 4:12 pm,
      Matthew says:

      If there were any reason for concern, the price would reflect it regardless of production techniques.

      • On February 3, 2020 at 4:16 pm,
        Matthew says:

        Production techniques have improved immensely for gold, as well, yet it continues to reflect the dollar’s lost purchasing power. Oil would the same and much more if there was any issue worth worrying about.

  5. On February 3, 2020 at 12:44 pm,
    cfs says:

    I remember buying gasoline as cheap as 19.9 cents a gallon, too, so it has gone up 200% in my lifetime (thanks to taxation).

    • On February 3, 2020 at 1:23 pm,
      b says:


    • On February 3, 2020 at 1:35 pm,
      Big Al says:

      Actually much more than 200%

      • On February 3, 2020 at 1:53 pm,
        cfs says:

        You’re certainly right; if you include taxes it’s closer to 2000%

        • On February 3, 2020 at 1:56 pm,
          cfs says:

          A brief summary of current accurate climate physics:

        • On February 3, 2020 at 4:01 pm,
          Matthew says:

          That’s an increase versus the dollar which means nothing since the dollar has MUCH less purchasing power today than it did then. In other words, gasoline is cheaper today than it was when it was 19.9 cents.
          Gold was $35/oz when gas was 19.9 cents so an ounce of gold was worth almost 176 gallons at the time. According to gaspricewatch(dot)com, the U.S. average today is $2.50 for regular gas. At $1580 gold, that’s 632 gallons per ounce. So gasoline is far cheaper today in real terms just as crude oil is.

          • On February 3, 2020 at 4:15 pm,
            OOTB Jerry says:

            Matthew………Good point as usual……….

          • On February 3, 2020 at 5:03 pm,
            Matthew says:

            Jerry, we could use median income, cars, houses, etc. in the example instead of gold and the results would be similar. Oil is very cheap and for good reason:

  6. On February 3, 2020 at 4:18 pm,
    OOTB Jerry says:

    Good thinking session………on the oil……..