Minimize

Welcome!

First the Constitution and now this!

Big Al
October 18, 2014
I know this isn`t new, but a good reminder~
Photos that need
no words or comment but please respond to the message at the end.


————————————————————————
Prayer request

 





ACLU has filed

a suit to end prayer from the
military completely. They’re making
Great progress.. The Navy
Chaplains can no longer mention Jesus’ name in

Prayer thanks to the ACLU and
others.


I’m not breaking
this
One.

 


If I get it

a 1000 times, I’ll forward it a
1000 times!
Let us

Pray…

 

Discussion
11 Comments
    Oct 19, 2014 19:28 AM

    Civil liberties mean NO liberties for anyone.

    The logical outcome of these power seekers.

    Four legs good. Two legs better.

      Oct 19, 2014 19:49 AM

      Please explain your comment Cecil.

      This dummy (Big Al) does not understand.

      Thanks,

      Al

    Oct 19, 2014 19:08 PM

    all blank??

      Oct 19, 2014 19:49 PM

      What is all blank?

        Oct 20, 2014 20:47 AM

        Pictures don’t load for me either dw jones.

          Oct 20, 2014 20:47 AM

          Interesting Skeeta because they load automatically on mine. Don’t know what to say!

    Oct 20, 2014 20:17 AM

    Gold up to 1241 in Asian trading. Charles Nenner mentioned going long if gold closed above 1240….Going to be an interesting day.

    CFS
    Oct 20, 2014 20:25 AM

    As a dues-paying member of the ACLU, I do not agree with everything they do.

    As an extreme conservative I also believe in verifyin g anything I see on the internet……

    FROM THE ACLU WEBSITE:
    The ACLU and Religion: Don’t Believe Everything You Read On the Internet
    10/13/2009
    PrintEmailRSSFacebookTwitterSee more sharing options
    By Will Matthews, ACLU of Northern California at 2:59pm
    A malicious and factually inaccurate e-mail accusing the ACLU of not standing solidly on the side of religious liberty – an e-mail that was first circulated six years ago – has once again reared its ugly head and popped up in the e-mail inboxes of people across the country. In an effort to set the record straight, below are two myths the e-mail passes off as truth, followed by the facts which effectively debunk the e-mail’s claims.

    MYTH: The ACLU has filed a lawsuit to have all cross-shaped headstones removed from federal cemeteries.

    FACT: The ACLU has never once advocated for or initiated any litigation in favor of removing cross-shaped headstones from federal cemeteries. In fact, as the website Politifact.com makes clear, there are no cross-shaped headstones at VA national cemeteries. The headstones and markers the government issues are rectangular.

    What the ACLU did do in 2006 was file a lawsuit seeking to protect the right of veterans and their families to choose religious symbols to engrave on headstones in federal cemeteries. The result of this litigation was not the forced removal of any crosses, but rather an expansion of the official government list of religious symbols allowed on headstones by the National Cemeteries Administration of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to include the Wiccan pentacle.

    There are military cemeteries with rows of crosses in them, but most of those are in Europe, the final resting place of some American troops killed during World War I and World War II. Those cemeteries are maintained by the American Battle Monuments Commission and, according to Politifact.com, are technically owned by the foreign country in which they are located but sit on land given to the U.S. for use in perpetuity as commemorative cemeteries. Politifact.com further reports that commission officials are not aware of any effort – by the ACLU or anyone else – to remove cross-shaped headstones from those sites.

    MYTH: The ACLU filed a lawsuit to end prayer in the military completely.

    FACT: The ACLU has filed no such lawsuit. This totally false assertion is likely misrepresenting a letter the ACLU and the ACLU of Maryland sent in June 2008 to officials at the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis asking them to stop forcing midshipmen to participate in the Academy’s compulsory “noon meal prayers.” A New York Times article very effectively details why forcing midshipmen to stand in attendance at the daily “noon meal prayer” is a violation of their religious freedom and rights of conscience.

    In the letter sent to the Academy, ACLU of Maryland Legal Director Deborah A. Jeon makes clear that the ACLU opposes compulsory religious services mandated by the government, not voluntary religious exercises by Academy midshipmen. As Jeon writes: “[T]his request is not motivated by any hostility to voluntary religious exercises by Academy midshipmen, nor do we fail to recognize the important place religious faith holds among many in the military. Indeed, the ACLU has long defended the fundamental right of religious communities, families and individuals – including those in the armed services – to practice their faith freely and openly.” Let there be no question that the ACLU vigorously defends the right of all Americans to practice religion (PDF).

    We at the ACLU sincerely hope that providing you with this factual information regarding the erroneous claims made in the e-mail will not only help you avoid bearing false witness, but, should you desire, also empower you to set the record straight should it find its way to you.

      bj
      Oct 20, 2014 20:59 AM

      Good post, CFS.

      The Constitution provides for freedom of religion–favoring no particular one or any cults that spawn a new religion. Yet with the creation of the federal income came an implied right of tax exemption for ‘non-profits’ and ‘religious institutions’–many of whom who worship money more than anything; and to that end invest in income property, commercial real estate and even major league ball teams! This privileged tax status amounts to taxpayer subsidies by everyone else to enhance the value of ‘nonprofit’ investments and their return on investment for those claiming to do God’s work, for example. Ironically, Christ teaches that the Kingdom of God is not to be found among worldly riches or the kingdom of kings.

      Now come the Neocons arguing that eliminating tax loopholes amounts to a tax increase on those who enjoy tax exemptions at everyone else’s expense. Their arguments are primarily targeted to defend crony capitalism (which falls within the sphere of fascism), but it extends to ‘nonprofit’s–notwithstanding that the ‘state should not establish any religion’. So why are everyday taxpayers of every stripe being forced to subsidize any religion or any ‘nonprofit” of any stripe? The answer is obvious and has nothing to do with an all powerful God that transcends all this nonsense. Name one enterprise that does not profit those who run it.

      We need to end all tax shelters. The Forbes flat tax aims in that direction, problem is that it does nothing to end all the crony captalism in the tax code to include the all the taxpayer subsidies to religious institutions.

        Oct 20, 2014 20:31 AM

        Also a great comment on your part bj!

      Oct 20, 2014 20:55 AM

      Many thanks Professor.

      You know, I interviewed a dept head of the ACLU a few years ago and I will have to say that she seemed to have her head screwed on pretty straight.