THE NEW GREEN NEW WORLD ORDER IS COMING SLAVE’S ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b440hz9u1Pc

Zbigniew Brzezinski is one of the puppet masters….

Obama Is Zbigniew Brzezinski Puppet
Commentary
By Webster Tarpley
3-21-8

Any lingering doubts about Obama’s status as an abject puppet of Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission ended this morning when the withered mummy of imperialism himself appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe* to campaign for Obama, urged on by his own moronic daughter, Mika Brzezinski, an Obama groupie and sycophant.
Zbigniew, a low-level Polish aristocrat whose life has been devoted to hatred for Russia, lauded Obama for his 2002 speech opposing the Iraq war, saying that he himself was the source of Obama’s arguments back then – thus confirming Obama’s long-term status as his puppet, which probably began in 1981-1983, when Obama was a student at Columbia University, and Zbig was directing the anti-Russian institute.

http://www.rense.com/general81/abig.htm

Spend some time and understand the parallels between the Carter administration and Obama administration, and you’ll hate big government even more than you do now….

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=zbigniew+brzezinski

Brzezinski is confirmed to be an Obama advisor:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/12/obama-adviser-leads-deleg_n_861…

From the History Commons:

In an interview, Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s National Security Adviser, admits that it was US policy to support radical Islamists to undermine Russia. He admits that US covert action drew Russia into starting the Afghan war in 1979. Asked if he has regrets about this, he responds, “Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border,

I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.” Then he is asked if he regrets “having given arms and advice to future terrorists,” and he responds, “What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?” The interviewer then says, “Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.” But Brzezinski responds, “Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam….” [Le Nouvel Observateur (Paris), 1/15/1998]

Will the AMERICAN people ever wake up……..good comments Shad………………ootb

Thanks Frank From moscow…..people focus so much on the president or other such figure heads, that they miss the point it is their administrations that do the dirty work.

Look at who’s in their inner circle and cabinet, and see which clubs they belong to, and you’ll know their foreign policy. People always act so surprised when something like a Ukraine flare up happens, but many were calling an issue with Russia the minute Brzezinski took up the Obama torch and was influential in his rise to power. Not a surprise at all as this is the global monopoly game these guys play.

One last post on Brzezinski, because I’m pissed he is still an influence in the world and maybe it will explain to some the actions of the current administration a little better:
_______________________

This is taken from his Wikipedia page:

“Brzezinski had a hand in writing parts of Carter’s inaugural address, and this served his purpose of sending a positive message to Soviet dissidents.[23] The Soviet Union and Western European leaders both complained that this kind of rhetoric ran against the “code of détente” that Nixon and Kissinger had established.[24][25] Brzezinski ran up against members of his own Democratic Party who disagreed with this interpretation of détente, including Secretary of State Cyrus Vance. Vance argued for less emphasis on human rights in order to gain Soviet agreement to Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT), whereas Brzezinski favored doing both at the same time. Brzezinski then ordered Radio Free Europe transmitters to increase the power and area of their broadcasts, a provocative reversal of Nixon-Kissinger policies.[26] West German chancellor Helmut Schmidt objected to Brzezinski’s agenda, even calling for the removal of Radio Free Europe from German soil.[27]

The State Department was alarmed by Brzezinski’s support for East German dissidents and objected to his suggestion that Carter’s first overseas visit be to Poland. He visited Warsaw, met with Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski (against the objection of the U.S. Ambassador to Poland), recognizing the Roman Catholic Church as the legitimate opposition to communist rule in Poland.[28]

By 1978, Brzezinski and Vance were more and more at odds over the direction of Carter’s foreign policy. Vance sought to continue the style of détente engineered by Nixon-Kissinger, with a focus on arms control. Brzezinski believed that détente emboldened the Soviets in Angola and the Middle East, and so he argued for increased military strength and an emphasis on human rights. Vance, the State Department, and the media criticized Brzezinski publicly as seeking to revive the Cold War.

Brzezinski advised Carter in 1978 to engage the People’s Republic of China and traveled to Beijing to lay the groundwork for the normalization of relations between the two countries. This also resulted in the severing of ties with the United States’ longtime anti-Communist ally the Republic of China (Taiwan).
For historical background on this period of history, see:

Iranian Revolution; Soviet invasion of Afghanistan; and Solidarity.

1979 saw two major strategically important events: the overthrow of U.S. ally the Shah of Iran, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The Iranian Revolution precipitated the Iran hostage crisis, which would last for the rest of Carter’s presidency. Brzezinski anticipated the Soviet invasion, and, with the support of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the People’s Republic of China, he created a strategy to undermine the Soviet presence. Using this atmosphere of insecurity, Brzezinski led the United States toward a new arms buildup and the development of the Rapid Deployment Forces – policies that are both more generally associated with Reagan’s presidency now.

Brzezinski, acting under a lame duck Carter presidency, but encouraged that Solidarity in Poland had vindicated his style of engagement with Eastern Europe, took a hard-line stance against what seemed like an imminent Soviet invasion of Poland. He even made a midnight phone call to Pope John Paul II – whose visit to Poland in 1979 had foreshadowed the emergence of Solidarity – warning him in advance. The U.S. stance was a significant change from previous reactions to Soviet repression in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968.”

Now that is has happened it is the new normal, and people are complacent as their country and rights have been stolen very openly by these clubs of politicians, bankers, heads of business, and media sellouts. What is amazing is how open the Council on Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission has been in their objectives, yet everyone just dismisses any real conversation as a conspiracy theory, or worse, acknowledges that its happening and just shrugs their shoulders.

Then if you bring up Bohemian Grove or the Bilderberg Group people laugh you out of the room as a tinfoil hat person. Well they continue to meet each year to flush out directives for world policy and these groups are all intertwined. Yet for the next year all we will here is BS about the presidential election (as if they had anything to do with the people that really pull the strings)
_______________________________________________________________
Bilderberg Group:

The group´s original goal of promoting Atlanticism has grown; In 2001, Denis Healey, a Bilderberg group founder and, a steering committee member for 30 years, said: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”
_____________________________________

Check out this link for a List of who’s been active in the Bilderberg Group, and ask yourself if the caliber of people on this list could maybe shake up a few things globally:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants

Yuuup! I don’t call the sheeple canonfoddershitforbrains for nothing!

Ha! tragic comedy but true…..

Oops, did I actually post that? 😉 😮

Yep, that was a big factor FFM.

And George HW Bush flew in a SR-71 to Tehran to make a deal?

Ditto Bob…………BIG OIL MONEY pushed the buttons………..

The Socialist Soviet Republic, died under the weight of its own bureaucracy. Reagan Did not win the cold war, simply the downfall of the US is happening more slowly, but it will die under the weight of its socialism.
Reagan was right in cutting taxes……that is the ONLY way for growth.
Reagan was ineffective in cutting spending and corruption.

Reagan was the first president to spend more than all prior presidents PUT TOGETHER. He and his myth got away with it because he talked a good talk and had the good fortune of taking office after a commodities super cycle peak and technological advances. Both unleashed such disinflationary and even deflationary forces that he could spend all he wanted to without much in the way of near term consequences or voter detection.
Reagan spent an unborn generation’s future. That generation is now 20 to 30 years old.

If you steal your uncle’s platinum American Express card and go on a spending spree, you can have a wonderful time right up until the bills come due.

Reagan got a lot of credit from the Right Wing but he was pretty useless as a president and literally marked the entry of government into every aspect of our lives. In the future, we will have a lot less government that we have today if for only the fact that we simply cannot afford the amount of government we have today.

I believe the time of the nation-state has come to an end. Clearly big government is a total failure.

Yes, it seems so easy after the Cold War is over. I was in military – nuclear strategic force – during most of 1980’s and I can tell you that what Reagan has achieved is almost miraculous.

CFS:

It’s not the function of government to eliminate poverty or to provide a bountiful economy or to reduce inflation (that they created) or to save the cities or to cure illiteracy or to provide energy.

It is only to get out of the way of their citizens so they can do all that. Government is never the solution, only the problem.

It may not be the purpose of government to eliminate poverty, to provide a bountiful economy, to reduce inflation, to save our cities, to cure illiteracy or provide energy…….
BUT”
They “control “the economy, or think they do.
They try to control inflation………..creating trillions in debt to do so.
We actually need government to police our cities.
Illiterate parents tend to produce illiterate children, so should not society provide basic education?
Government does indeed regulate most things at an increasing level, including energy.

Limited control GOOD, Total control, BAD.

GOVERNMENT is TOO BIG, TOO CONTROLLING.

So expensive and controlling, it is destroying the country.

Time for revolution.

CFS:

While I may agree with you in principal, Congress just passed an act that allows them to remove your passport just for saying what you said.

We don’t really have to worry about big government. They will be manning the barricades once the paychecks stop. In Greece it’s the civil servants doing the riots. It will be the same here.

Matthew: Actually governments are wonderful at making good situations worse. Everything they do they accomplish exactly the opposite.

We need smaller unit of governments.

I agree but no government at all would be best.

Best for whom?

Matthew agreed.

Is there a precedent that you might refer to (SD Marc) that would illuminate how a system of no government would work? I mean one where there is the possibility of there being sufficient local resources that everyone could coexist without wars breaking out in every neighborhood once government was gone?

You guys have kind of a fantasy really. An idea of zero tax and free-for-all idealism without restraint that cares nothing for the impacts on environmental degradation or the rights of others.

Basically, your anarchist vision means a return to “the strong survive” and all others perish. But for whose benefit is that and secondly….are you really sure you will be amongst the winners in that game?

ONE NATION UNDER GOD …..would be a start……do not steal, do not lie , do not covet ……that would eliminate 100% of the problems we have with the GOVT.
They would not steal the money, they would not embellish the lie , and they would not be in DEBT., FOR it says go and owe no one…………..real simple………….

Using their Hollywood, the elites have done a real number on people’s perceptions. Take the old west, for instance. For all practical purposes, there was no government or at least no government involvement in everyday life.
Those who’ve been planning their global domination for a very long time couldn’t let the sheeple know how well things really worked without coercive thieves running things so they decide to wave their wands (made of holly wood) and make the truth go away.

“Shootouts, bank robberies, highly-choreographed bar brawls—if we know anything about the frontier, it’s that it was one hell of a violent place.

Or was it? Turns out the popular image of the Old West as a place where manly men solved their differences by shooting those differences in the face simply isn’t true. People were more likely to cooperate than fight—in a harsh and lawless world, it was better to side with your neighbor for mutual benefit than start shooting. Bank robberies, too, were virtually unheard of. One estimate places the number at about a dozen for the entire frontier period.

Then you have the low-homicide rates. The highest annual body count Tombstone ever experienced? Five. From 1870 to 1885, Dodge City and Wichita had murder rates of 0.6 per year. However you cut it, daily cowboy life was nowhere near as violent as we think.”
http://listverse.com/2013/02/18/9-crazy-truths-about-the-wild-west/

http://www.unpopulartruth.com/2009/04/myths-of-old-west.html

Read “Anatomy Of The State” By Murray N. Rothbard
https://www.mises.org/library/anatomy-state

“Look at the entire world. Which countries contain the most peaceful, the most moral, and the happiest people? Those people are found in the countries where the law least interferes with private affairs; where government is least felt; where the individual has the greatest scope, and free opinion the greatest influence; where administrative powers are fewest and simplest; where taxes are lightest and most nearly equal, and popular discontent the least excited and the least justifiable; where individuals and groups most actively assume their responsibilities, and, consequently, where the morals of admittedly imperfect human beings are constantly improving; where trade, assemblies, and associations are the least restricted; where labor, capital, and populations suffer the fewest forced displacements; where mankind most nearly follows its own natural inclinations; where the inventions of men are most nearly in harmony with the laws of God; in short, the happiest, most moral, and most peaceful people are those who most nearly follow this principle: Although mankind is not perfect, still, all hope rests upon the free and voluntary actions of persons within the limits of right; law or force is to be used for nothing except the administration of universal justice. ”

Read “The Law” by Frederic Bastiat
http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html

Good point about the wild west not being nearly as violent as hollywood has made it, and that people were more likely to work together with their neighbors for survival.

Also that was a good snippet from Frederic Bastiat. Very interesting perspective and I tend to agree.

There are places in the world like Tibet that traditionally shunned all the government intervention and while some was present, they managed society with their particular spiritual and philosophical guidance, and while far from perfect, they didn’t devolve into anarchy. Look at some of the changes from Burma to Myanmar, where things got so ugly and violent with oppressive governments, that a new movement has developed where instead of Gross Domestic Product, they are now starting to measure and quantify their success as a nation with Gross National Happiness. It was scoffed at when introduced originally, but in the last 3-5 years their model has affected more and more of the policies and initiatives of the people and govenment.

Gross National Happiness

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_National_Happiness

There is another interesting movement in South Africa called the Umbuntu party, were they are advocating for a new social makeup of “Contributionism” where everyone contributes their best gift and resources for set amounts of time and the communities are incredibly abundant, everyone is becoming much more prosperous, and they are taking back their communities from the clutches of the Banksters. Pretty interesting changes going on in the world where Big Government is not needed.
____________________________
Umbuntu Liberation Movement:

“The New UBUNTU Flags have arrived and are flying high in Waterval Boven and will be flying high all over South Africa for the 2016 Local Elections. FREE ELECTRICITY FOR ALL – this is the foundation of our community activation with a host of community projects, to create abundance for all our people in every town or village and eventually in all cities.

We will be focusing on the 12 smallest municipalities with rivers, so that we can deliver on the free electricity with our access to advanced hydro-turbine technology is over 40 time as efficient as existing turbine tech. Every day more people all over South Africa are calling our office to join us and represent UBUNTU in their area.

While we are struggling with admin and emails we expect this to ease as our new office manager and coordinator joins us at the beginning of August. We hope to inspire the smaller towns with a strong representation in the big cities like Soweto, Tembisa, Kagiso, Mamelodi and others. Since the UBUNTU Workshop in Soweto on Sunday 26th July, the the word has spread rapidly and seeds have been planted deeply in the hearts of South Africans.

The rest is up to us all, to stand up against the abuse and exploitation of the corrupt government and the criminal activity of the SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK. We will take our country back, one town at a time and create a landslide of towns that move to the UBUNTU way of life – UTOPIA for all – the way we should live our lives – expressing our natural talents and gifts from the divine for the benefit of all those in our communities.”

http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za/

I just read this article where the Umbuntu party in South Africa is encouraging Greece to cut it’s ties with the banksters and start managing it own affairs in a new system of banking. It is a little over-the-top and utopian, but I like the general spirit of what they are advocating. It is just interesting that change is finally starting to turn over the old paradigm. I’ll attach the article below as it is at least an interesting occurrence in the world, and ties into the Greek effect and uprooting central banks.
_______________________________

Message to the people of Greece – From The UBUNTU Party
You can be the inspiration that the rest of the world needs to follow you out of financial and economic slavery of the global banking elite.

The UBUNTU Party recommends the steps below – which are the same steps presented in the manifesto we used in the South African and UK elections of 2014 and 2015.

Restructure the entire banking system to serve the people, and not enslave the people.

Establish a PEOPLE’S BANK that creates money for the people by the people, tax-free and interest-free, which will result in 100% employment and stop the financial enslavement. The new People’s Bank will provide funds for everything we need to do in our communities – this is how simple it is.

Let our scientists and inventors deliver a renewable source of Free Energy to drive the nation and benefit the people.

Support our traditional healers and research scientists in finding alternative cures for all diseases and prevent the drug cartels from hiding such cures from the people.

Support our farmers at every level to grow organic food; ban all GMO seeds and giants like Monsanto; plant food gardens across the nation so that no one ever goes hungry again.

Decentralize the government so that people can govern themselves in their own communities – taking care of their own needs immediately, supported by the new People’s Bank on every level.

Restructure the judiciary and the legal system, to be written by the people for the people, unlike the unjust legal system we face in our courts today, which favours the rights of corporations above those of living breathing human beings.

The UBUNTU Liberation Movement and the UBUNTU Party stands united with the people of Greece who want to free themselves from the financial enslavement of the global banking elite.

http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za/2015/07/message-to-people-of-greece-from-ubuntu.html

Good point and comment on the South African Umbunta Party……….I would say wake up GREECE time to KICK OUT THE BANKERS.