Minimize

Welcome!

These 5 charts say the Nasdaq’s surge is different this time

November 9, 2015

I found this article to be very interesting. We chat about bubbles all the time but the charts presented here provide a different outlook on the tech sector. Now these charts do not take into account monetary stimulus and other external factors but there are some positive aspects inside the sector that should provide investors a bit more confidence.

Click here to visit the original posting page over at MarketWatch.

Bubble 2.0? A technology series from MarketWatch

Our weeklong “Bubble 2.0?” series revisited the dot-com bust of 15 years ago and examines the similarities, differences and lessons for investors today.

The Nasdaq-100 surged to an all-time high this week, sending a chill through investors with vivid memories of the dot-com bust 15 years ago that wiped out trillions of dollars in wealth.

In 2002, after the last technology bubble popped, former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the Fed couldn’t reliably identify an asset bubble. His predecessor, Alan Greenspan, tried to, making his infamous “irrational exuberance” speech of Dec. 5, 1996, but he missed the mark by a few years.

There will be another tech bust someday, and a lot of people will lose a lot of money. Does the recent run up in the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 NDX, -1.40% which had a 53% weighting in technology as of Nov. 5, warn that a repeat of history is right around the corner?

The famous last words of any buyer at a peak are “It’s different this time. ” But investors can take some comfort knowing that is exactly what the following five charts seem to suggest.

FactSet

The aggregate price-to-earnings ratio — a measure of how much investors are paying for earnings — for the Nasdaq-100 is less than a third of what it was at the peak of the 2000 tech bubble. In other words, investors may be paying a lot for tech stocks, but they’re getting a lot more for their money now, than they did 15 years ago.

The following chart shows that while the Nasdaq-100 has outperformed the broad market by a wide margin so far this year — it was up 11% through Thursday, while the S&P 500 was up 1.9% — revenues at its component companies are rising even faster. During the Nasdaq-100’s surge up to its peak in March 2000, sales-per-share had barely budged.

FactSet

Another sign that investors are getting a lot more for their money is growth in dividends per share.

During the tech boom 15 years ago, many dot-com companies used whatever cash they had — and some they didn’t — to try to grow their brands. Now, many companies are rewarding their investors by returning some of their cash hoard to investors through dividends. The higher the dividend, the wider the safety net for investors.

FactSet

Some investors might worry that the Nasdaq-100 has been rallying too far too fast, but the next chart shows it is rising at about the same rate as corporate profit growth. When the tech bubble was inflating in the late 1990s, the Nasdaq-100’s surge belied the decline in corporate profit.

FactSet

The next chart shows how the pace of the Nasdaq-100’s current climb to new highs is much more leisurely than it was 15 years ago. As the saying goes, the candle that burns twice as bright burns half as long.

FactSet

If the current rally is indicative of another technology bubble, the above chart may be of some comfort, as it suggests the pop won’t be nearly as loud — or costly.

Discussion
4 Comments
    Nov 09, 2015 09:26 AM

    Oh well, only a 50%ish crash then if I am reading that last chart correctly. 🙂

    Nov 09, 2015 09:55 PM

    I prefer the s and p 500 index. still at 20 x pe the market is not all that cheap. I am buying more DIS again , i love thier tv and movie franchise. best of health and wealth to you all . S

    Nov 09, 2015 09:55 PM

    Does the S&P500 bull market from 2003-2007 look like a bubble? No. But it still crashed violently.

      Nov 09, 2015 09:06 PM

      good point Daniel. I’m not sure we can always extrapolate the angle of the increase and compare two different bubble-like expansions….they are all unique and the marketplace now is nothing like it was in the late 1990’s. There was a real marketplace back then, no QE, and no Fed blather. Apples and oranges.