Pundit's Perspectives – Fri 22 Apr, 2016

Expected returns after 3, 4 or 5 down years

I have not had a chance to go back and check the numbers presented in the post below but it is no secret that when an asset class experiences multiple down years in a row the subsequent years can be very profitable. No matter what anyone says it is very hard to buy exactly at the bottom of any markets. That said even if you miss the bottom markets can run for a couple years after. If the washout is over for commodities and emerging markets and if the percentage gains presented in the post are correct we could be in for some good returns. Take a read below and let us know what you think.

Click here to visit the posting site over at MebFaber.com

50% Returns Coming for Commodities and Emerging Markets?

If history is any guide, we’re standing at the edge of 40%–96% returns over the next two years.

This isn’t wishful thinking or wild speculation. I’m not selling anything. Rather, I’m just reporting historical gains from a market set-up that’s repeating itself right now.

So what’s going on?

Well, imagine a rubber band. If you stretch it only slightly then let it go, it’s not going to shoot very far. On the other hand, if you stretch the rubber band to its full elasticity then release it, it’s going to rocket across the room.

History suggests we’re about to see some asset classes rocket across the room.

Back in 2008, I wrote my first book The Ivy Portfolio.  While the focus of the book was asset allocation and basic trend following models, I also touched upon mean reversion strategies. For anyone who’s unaware, mean reversion is the idea that markets tend to have a general equilibrium level. And though their values will rise and fall, sometimes to extreme levels for long periods, eventually they tend to gravitate back toward their unique equilibrium level. And like a rubber band, the more stretched markets get, and the longer they stay stretched, the faster they’ll race back to equilibrium when they finally start moving.

Below is a chart from The Ivy Portfolio that shows some historical returns associated with mean reversion.

 

bl

 

Before we get to the opportunity before us right now, I’ll provide a bit more context to help you see how “stretched” we really are.

As it has been 8 years since writing The Ivy Portfolio, I wanted to re-run the numbers and expand the data set. So I started by taking the asset class set above and increasing it to 10 broad assets classes, and extending the tests back to 1972.

But this time, I did something different. When I originally ran these tests for The Ivy Portfolio, I looked at only the 1-year returns after the asset began reverting. But I realized there’s no reason to believe the gains should stop after just one year. So this time, I expanded the hold period to two  years. The results are very interesting:

  1. Three down years in a row from one asset class is still quite rare.  It has only happened six times across 378 total years, or less than 2% of the time. But when it happens the returns are impressive:
    1. 30 Year Bonds 1978-1980. A two-year return of 48%
    2. US, Foreign, Emerging Stocks 2000-2002.  Two-year returns of 43%, 69%, 96%, respectively.
    3. (For those of you counting, yes, that’s just four of the six occurrences. The remaining two are happening now, which we’ll get to in just a moment.)
  2. We can run similar studies that analyze countries, sectors, and industries rather than asset classes. But since they are more concentrated and more volatile, it makes sense to increase our “down years” time-frame from two to three years to three, four, and five years. Dating back to the 1920’s, these are still rare occurrences.  Down three years in a row only occurs about 3% of the time; down four about 1% of the time, and down five straight years happens almost never. But the returns are just as impressive as those we found with asset classes.
    1. Countries down three years in a row returned 56% over the ensuing two years. If down four years in a row, it bumps to 74%. Five years in a row? 135%.
    2. For sectors, we find three down years returns 60% over the ensuing two years. Four years jumps to 91%. Five years returns, 138%
    3.  For industries, down 3 years = 59% returns; down 4 years = 80% returns; and five straight down years returns 105% over the ensuring two years.
  1. A basic rule of thumb is that if the asset is down two, three, four, and five years in a row you can expect future two year total returns of 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%. (So multiply the number of years down in a row by two.)

 

2y

 

So, with all this in mind, we have some exciting opportunities at this very moment.

On the large asset class level, we have two assets that are down three years in a row. As mentioned above, this is just the fifth and sixth times across 378 years that this opportunity has existed.  What are they?

Emerging stocks and commodities.

We’ve written at length on cheap valuations for emerging stocks and foreign stocks in general, and we believe you could see strong returns in the coming years for both. As I wrote above, the last time today’s set-up occurred in emerging stocks, two-year returns were 96%. We’ve never seen this from commodities over the past 40 years—who knows what the returns could be?

As far as opportunities from smaller sectors, countries, and industries, we wrote about this trend in the fall, mentioning coal stocks specifically. But other industries currently down five years in a row include gold miners and the yen.  And all three of these assets are having monster years in 2016. Coal is up 40%, gold miners up 66%, and the yen up 10%.

As far as countries go, Brazil, which we wrote about as being the cheapest country in the world at the beginning of the year, is up a staggering 36%.

Even though these 2016 gains are already big, history suggests the rubber band has been so stretched there’s still major gains ahead.

Will check back in 2018!