Weekend Special – Sat 9 Jul, 2016

Weekend Show Segment 3 – Lawrie Williams on what will drive gold in 2016

There was an error when uploading segment 3 when I was in Spain therefore here is the full segment…

Lawrie Williams, editor of LawrieOnGold.com joins Cory to discuss the factors that he thinks will continue to drive gold in 2016. In the first half of 2016 we have seen general fear, fear of equity market crashes around the world, interest rates continuing to fall in Europe, no rate hikes by the Fed, lack of physical demand in China and India, all to name a few that have had a push and pull impact on the gold price. Now we need to look forward to the rest of the year to determine what will drive gold for the rest of the year.

Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show

Lawrie WilliamsCory Fleck

  1. On July 9, 2016 at 3:19 am,
    Skeeta says:

    Thanks Cory.

  2. On July 9, 2016 at 10:47 am,
    Markedtofuture says:

    Now we need to look forward to the rest of the year to determine what will drive gold for the rest of the year. Banl Fraud?

    The Little Foreclosure Heard Around The World


  3. On July 9, 2016 at 5:18 pm,
    CFS says:

    OFF TOPIC. Ignore, unless you are sick of the ignorance being spouted, the racist president and and so-called experts on the media.
    The most comprehensive pdf on crime statistics which include racial data is:

    It’s 27 pages of data… At least you will be able to judge the truth or otherwise of TV Pundits.

    • On July 9, 2016 at 6:36 pm,
      Wayne says:

      I am sick of the evil being spouted, but is my sickness subjective or objective?

  4. On July 10, 2016 at 12:53 pm,
    Markedtofuture says:

    Sugar Daddy FED Creates Generation of Prostitutes

    By California Lawyer | Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 11:47 am

    Economics is based on human behavior. “One of the central tenets of economics is that people want certain things and will change their behavior to get those things – in other words, people will respond to incentives.”

    Applying this to the FED’s policies, and ramifications, should then yield logical connections between the results of the FED’s policies, and their intentions in implementing them, then, right?

    Stated differently, the FED intends the consequences of their actions, correct?

    If the consequences are unintended, then, it means that the FED’s actions were lacking intellectual rigor, meaning they stupidly did not consider the outcome before acting. Or, nefariously, instead, the FED’s claim that the consequences were not intended is but a lie, as the reality is that the FED intended that which occurred all along.

    So, with this backdrop, let’s look at some consequences of the FED easy money, in a way that exposes the FED as a corrupt organization hell bent on saving the too big to fail banks at all costs.