Hour 2 – Politics – We hear from both the Democratic and Republican Party
Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show
In the second hour we feature our new KER Politics show. We decided to dedicate half an hour each to the Democratic and Republican Party respectively. We hear from each side they think their nominee is the right choice to lead the Country for the next four years.
- Segment 5 & 6: We start off with the Democratic view point on why you should vote for Hillary Clinton with Democratic Activist Helen Worley.
- Segment 7 & 8: Now for the Republican view with Washington State Trump Campaign Member Brad Howard making the case for Donald Trump.
Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show
Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show
Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show
Click download link to listen on this device: Download Show
great job on the worley interview, cory and al.
And, of course Helen Worley is so blinded by her sexist beliefs, that she is incapable of seeing truth.
Faith is just another word for total blindness to the whole truth.
Why did you not ask her about the Clinton Foundadtion siphoning Off assets that might otherwise have been used to help the poor and the suffering?
Why I did you not ask Helen Worley about Hillary’s REPEATED insults to military personnel?
The are none so blind that those who do not wish to see.
HRC did not make a mistake in installing a server. It was intended to circumvent FOIA.
It will be interesting to see her excuse Hillary being pardoned by Obama’s!
I will agree on one point: Hillary is much, much better at lying than Trump.
She is probably more intelligent than Trump.
It is a pity that she (HRC) is without an honest moral compass.
It is a pity that she accepted near birth abortion, which any sane person would call murder.
Julian Assange: “Hillary Made The FBI Look Weak, And Now They’re Out For Payback”
In an extended, 25 minute interview with Australia’s John Pilger, posted now in its entirety on RT, Julian Assange said Hillary Clinton sparked an FBI backlash, which is now surfacing, when she stonewalled the Feds, who were trying to investigate her private server.
When asked by John Pilger about the significance of the FBI’s intervention in this last week of the US election campaign in the case against Hillary Clinton, Assange responds that “If you go to the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America’s political police. And the FBI demonstrated with taking down the former head of the CIA over classified information given to his mistress [that] almost no one was untouchable. The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that, “No one can resist us.” But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation. So, there is anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.”
The discussion with Mrs Worley had nothing to do with any of those issues. I must add that the same could be said of Mr. Trump is some cases.
The issue is nothing more than illustrating both sides of the coin.
Agree or disagree both sides of the coin must be considered and then an individual decision make.
I have to say that one of the reasons I have so much respect for Ron Paul; Walter Jones; Brian Baird; Jeff Deist; and, of course Glen Downs is that none of these individuals “throw stones” at the other side. We need more intelligent, unemotional discussion if we are going to make our country great.
Personal slander is totally uncalled for in this discussion.
Cfs, have all of those allegations been proven?
Assange: Clinton is a cog for Goldman Sachs & the Saudis (JOHN PILGER EXCLUSIVE VIDEO & TRANSCRIPT)
Whistleblower Julian Assange has given one of his most incendiary interviews ever in a John Pilger Special, courtesy of Dartmouth Films, in which he summarizes what can be gleaned from the tens of thousands of Clinton emails released by WikiLeaks this year.
John Pilger, another Australian émigré, conducted the 25-minute interview at the Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has been trapped since 2012 for fear of extradition to the US. Last month, Assange had his internet access cut off for alleged “interference” in the American presidential election through the work of his website.
https://www.rt.com/news/365405-assange-pilger-full-transcript/
Marketofuture, they are both doing what simply makes “good business sense” Maybe as this week will eventually bring out.
Thought that comment on faith was a good one.
I heard it as “faith is a belief in something you know aint so”
Its a great interview, well worth watching
I have to say b, that “faith is what a person believes to be the truth” and not “something that you know ain’t so”
Common man!
Think ur disagreeing with M Twain on that one Al, I was just sayin I heard it that way
Beliefs that aren’t supported by evidence require faith. A belief that demonstrably “ain’t so” is supported by delusion, not faith.
Al you are so right. We need to unify after the election or this country is toast no matter who is POTUS.
Thanks Dr.
INTELLIGENT???? THIS BIRD HAS NO CLUE: KILLARY CLINTON IS A NEOCON NAZI: IF SHE EVER CROSSED MY PATH I WOULD SHOR….NUFF SPIT IN HER FACE:
Now come on Ugly, I would bet that you have more class than that!
Now come on Lookingin,
That is just plain silly!
It’s flamboyant language, but basically true, Al.
Hillary Clinton is a war criminal with the blood of many, many thousands on her hands.
If you look just into the destruction of Libya, I believe she could be indicted and hanged by Nuremberg standards.
I guess a different story has been sold to the willfully ignorant public. Even so, not many doubt she’s dirty as hell, but they vote for her anyway.
Well GH, you certainly know what I think after much research and thought on mu part.
Let’s see what happens when she is investigated and she will be!
Al, do you mean that the last 25 years of investigations were insufficient?
Yes, it is.
But that doesn’t mean that it is not so.
Good take on possible outcome
Jacob Weisberg talks to the Financial Times Chief Economics Commentator Martin Wolf about the economic future of America under a Trump presidency and its global consequences.
I’m with Her!
if you do not have time to read this book, take a look at the 444 customer reviews.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01GYPLR1U/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1#customerReviews
Plus Bobby Dolly Kyle’s riveting book ‘Hillary – the other woman’.
Five FBI field offices are investigating the racketeering of the foundation and the foreign connections of Teneo. The offices include New York; Los Angeles; Washington, D.C.; Little Rock, Arkansas; and Miami. Little Rock is the home of the Clinton Foundation, while New York is the home base of Teneo. The addition of the Miami field office to the Clinton probe is significant.
One of Teneo Intelligence’s many global offices is located in Bogota, Colombia. A secretive Colombian private equity fund, «Fondo Acceso», financed by Mexican mega-billionaire Carlos Slim and Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra, is run out of the Clinton Foundation’s Bogota office. Tracking the money being fed into the Clinton Foundation may include proceeds from the illegal narcotics traffic in Colombia and other nearby countries. The Bogota activities of the Clinton Foundation, «Fondo Acceso», which ironically means «Access Fund», and Teneo appear to be concentrated in the Chico Business Park in the Colombian capital. Therefore, the involvement of the Miami office, in investigating Clinton Foundation funding, including the major donations from Slim and Giustra, makes a world of sense.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-04/hillary-and-bill-clinton-bonnie-clyde-american-politics
SR 1319 – BREAKING-4Chan – COVER-UP HAPPENING NOW … Published on Nov 5, 2016
This dispels the statement by Mr Howard: nothing is made in america! it true that jobs are fewer but… Manufacturing is the largest and most dynamic sector of the U.S. economy.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-manufacturing-dead-output-has-doubled-in-three-decades-2016-03-28
Interesting point, Bobby
Bad Hombres, Nasty Women…..
Donald Trump sings Mahna Mahna at Presidential Debate with Hillary Clinton
Donald Trump (Alec Baldwin) and Hillary Clinton (Kate McKinnon) take questions from undecided voters….
Chris Wallace (Tom Hanks) moderates the final debate between Donald Trump (Alec Baldwin) and Hillary Clinton (Kate McKinnon)…
The best Donald Trump interview…….
That was an absolutely hilarious skit.
Hilarious,
The primaries, the debates, and this whole presidential charade and media circus has been beyond hilarious, but it is tragic comedy, as either candidate is s false choice, (or at best they are terrible choices) and now America and world will live with this choice for the next 4 years.
I’m going all in on publicly traded liquor and beer companies as I predict their consumption will be one of the few bright spots of growth in the economy over the next 4 years. 😉
Excelsior, you are one SMART MAN!
Thanks Big Al. Right back at ya.
Cute Excelsior. Nothing like Weird Al
🙂
How about this bomb shell?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sbT3_9dJY4
Thanks Peter.
By the way Andrew, Mrs Worley is an Anglican Priest (Retired)
When do you ever retire from the word.. 😉
Now Jerry, that is a great point.
No surprise here, Peter
If we are one nation under God, then say hello to President Trump!
karl, I certainly do agree with you!
Please…..give me just ONE of DT’s traits that resemble Jesus.
fair enough, Dr.
Regardless, would you agree that at this point in history we are a “fallen people” I am currently studying the Old Testament and I see so darn many similarities between then and now.
Thank God that my life is centered around “The Proclamation of the Kingdom”
FWIW good timeline & extensive overview in this:
The real Clinton email scandal is that a bullshit story has dominated the campaign
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit
But since IT server management is the crucial theme this election I doubt that considering The Donald’s previous business e-mail behavior, a Trump administration will change for the better:
Donald Trump’s Companies Destroyed Emails in Defiance of Court Orders
In the magazine
http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120
AJ, a pretty well proven fact that we definitely do not have two “angels” running for the office of President. I personally voted NOT FOR THE MAN, but for the movement.
Everyone knows that I consider Trump a lightweight and much more friendly to the status quo than they think, but he IS an angel when compared to Hillary based on what is widely know about the two, so far.
who’s behind the movement, Al, the KKK?
There’s more evidence that Clintons are the racists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCG-0wVIVZI
I suppose you think her occult practices are cool…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfL5KwUuvMc
Bobby, I have a lot of respect for your intelligence and I mean that.
The only thing that I know about the Klan is that it is anti black equality. I don’t see just how that philosophy fits into this elections.
The Ku Klux Klan (KKK), or simply “the Klan”, is the name of three distinct past and present movements in the United States that have advocated extremist reactionary currents such as white supremacy, white nationalism, anti-immigration, and, especially in later iterations, Nordicism,[7][8] anti-Catholicism,[9][10] and antisemitism,[10] historically expressed through terrorism aimed at groups or individuals whom they opposed.[11] All three movements have called for the “purification” of American society, and all are considered right wing extremist organizations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
Al you need to get Jeff Deist back on your show immediately to rinse this vulgar pro Clinton nonsense from your site.
+1
Hillary supporters clearly lack a judgment gene and should be ashamed of themselves.
Ditto plus 20000
They will be ashamed, some day, too late.
We actually did a Weekend Special with Jeff which I will post shortly.
I’ll pass on this segment.
Have to agree with that sentiment.
I listened to the first segment and nearly lost my breakfast. Forced myself to listen to the second to see if Al would call her out on Hillary’s crimes.
After listening to the second segment I was not going to waste any time with 3 and 4.
I know that you made a mistake on that decision Eddy. I was actually contacted by the Trump campaign on both the state and national level and thanked for the interview with Brad Howard. Brad, by the way, convinced me to vote for Trump in the end and as I said earlier we donated a meaningful amount of money to his campaign. See what happens whey you let emotions get in the way of your thinking?
Helen W.
I just had to laugh recalling Paul C Roberts comment “If women vote for Clinton it will be proof it was a mistake to give women the vote”.
Experience? lol Unreal, ask the people of Lybia and Syria etc
We have got to be the absolute stupidest species in creation.
Actually, may be true about giving women the vote.
On average, women are far less knowledgeable/interested in politics than men.
The founding fathers limited the vote specifically to land owners only. They were the ones that had something to lose. When non-owners get a chance to vote….they push to take from those who have and give to the “have nots”. After many decades of this, we are starting to see the effects….which I believe have become irreversible.
Brad H.
People upset jobs moving to other countries.
Investors loved it. big dividends and increasing share prices.
Now were going to attempt to get those jobs back?
Just in time for AI, just check out how many jobs are going to be lost when driverless trucking happens, we already are creating warehouses with hardly a soul in them.
Manufacturing by hand? I doubt it.
So, has anyone actually said where new jobs are going to be created?
Oh, check the size of Alibaba, if the U.S. wants manufacturing jobs, meaning U.S. robots being used instead of other nations robots, they are going to have to come up with products other nations want and cant produce themselves.
This get jobs back was a good idea 20 years ago, but heck, we wanted dividends and rising share prices.
Funny how the world works.
b, did you check just where my vote and money went during this election. If not, I would strongly suggest that you do!
Glad to hear it Al.
Trump is infinitely superior to war.
sorry to hear that Al. although i respect your decision, i simply could not support a man of that sort of character. Could you imagine your daughter dating him? Do we really want criminalized abortion again? torture?
Doctor, there are many valid points in all of this discussion. I will repeat, I did not vote for the man, I voted for the movement. That’s my story and I am sticking to it.
I just hope that everyone has put as much effort in making their decision as I have!
After listening to Ms. Helen Worley, I have to ask myself: What planet am I on?
Again, Robert I would direct you to my recent replies to Eddy. My interviews got at least one vote for Trump plus almost five hundred dollars in his war chest.
What is my opinion of Mrs. Worley? She is a woman of true conviction and I respect that. Remember Robert, we are all free to have our own opinions in this country.
GENESIS – Land of Confusion
Truly disgusting, Mr. Big Al Korelin.
Very disappointed in you and Cory.
The woman you had on is nothing but a brainwashed shill for Hillary.
If Hillary is so competent and upstanding why did she have a private email server in the first place and why were emails regarding state policy being sent through it?
And she thinks Hillary’s foreign policy is so wonderful. Tell that to the millions displaced, killed or wounded in Libya, Syria and so many other countries who are victims of Hillary.
The countries in the Middle East that fund ISIS have given Hillary and her foundation millions of dollars. They also have given Bill millions for some speeches.
If anyone reads what the FBI found and Wikileaks it is beyond obvious that Hillary is beyond corrupt and is a criminal.
Why did you waste our time with this woman? If you were going to have her on you should have had someone to call her out on Hillary’s crimes. You should have someone who knows about Hillary’s crimes debate her.
The sad thing is that the majority of voters are just like her.
Which is why you’re going to get 8 years of this
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvfD8eVXYAEGfOs.jpg
You laughed during that interview, but Mr. Big Al Korelin there is nothing funny about it all.
See my earlier comment to you Eddy and you will realize just how much of a mistake you actually made!
Hillary did break the law but Helen is too brainwashed to notice…
Here are Comey’s findings, which demonstrate full violation of multiple provisions of federal law:
Hillary Clinton utilized multiple “different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.” So she was lying when she said that she only set up the system so that she could use one handheld device.
Hillary transmitted classified information. Here’s Comey: “From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were ‘up-classified’ to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.” So she lied that no classified information was received or sent.
Hillary did not hand over all her work emails to the State Department. At least three of those emails were classified “at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level.” Comey was kind here to Hillary – he said that there was no evidence that “any of the additional work-related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.” Except, of course, that deleting such emails would be the entire purpose of having a private server.
Hillary’s lawyers didn’t read the emails they deleted – they just deleted stuff based on header information and search terms. “It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server,” Comey said. This would be destroying possibly classified material. And as Comey says, there may be a fair bit of data they never saw: “It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.”
Comey admitted openly that Hillary’s team was “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information….None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.”
Hillary knew that classified material was passing across her server; as Comey acknowledged, “even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”
Hillary’s server could have been hacked, and some of her emails were likely hacked in other people’s inboxes: “With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”
So, Hillary lied. She lied that she never transmitted classified information. She lied that she only used a private server because she wanted one device. She lied that the State Department allowed her to jerry-rig this technological set-up. She lied that the emails were never breached.
Heck, even the HufPo Clinton organ admitted back in July Hillary broke the law. (Of course HufPo thinks it makes no difference because Hillary is above the law.)
Evidence Hillary Clinton Broke Federal Laws And Jeopardized National Security, No Charges Recommended… WTF, FBI?!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/d-c-rutledge/fbi-clinton-was-extremely_b_10818458.html
The dust has not settle yet Eddy. And, the term “broke federal law” was not used the term was “extreme carelessness”
Comey may have not come out and said those exact words.
But the actions of Clinton that he detailed were violations of law.
Please read what Judge Andrew Napolitano has written about this.
If you don’t like him just watch Comey’s press conference and remember that many of the laws Hillary broke do not require intent.
And why would Al or anyone accept the opinions coming out of a thoroughly corrupt system?
Comey’s previous position was as a board member of HSBC bank.
…..at about the same time that they were indicted for laundering BILLIONS for the Mexican drug cartels.
Nobody went to prison over that…..and Comey ended up in charge of the FBI…..go figure.
Oh yeah…..and do a simple Google search of Clinton Foundation and HSBC to give you a hint of how it really works.
Al, a little homework and common sense are all one should need to know that the Clintons are very bad people — even when compared only to politicians and not the general public.
Have I ever approved of their past “alleged” actions?
No, I don’t think so.
Big Al…I don’t think there any “alleged” actions when it comes to the Clintons. Anything you can think of that involves corruption or deceit belong to them…
And the above info is from this summer. Much more has come out since then detailing Hillary’s corruption in so many other areas.
How can anyone believe what Helen believes about Clinton?
Eddy, simply because nothing has been proven in a court of law.
Exactly, and Hillary and others are going to make sure that none of this makes it into a court of law.
I guess that it all depends on whether or not it gets to a court of law. So far, we don’t know how that will turn out.
You mean the court of law controlled by Lorretta Clinton…..er, I mean Lynch ?
Seriously ?
Where are you people spawned from ?
Comey laid out SEVERAL of the ILLEGALITIES in July…..then said…..no need to prosecute. It would seem that some agents of the FBI, who have been at it much longer than Comey…..had a problem with that.
Sure Eddy, probably at least 40% of the voters do at this point. Do you and I agree? Probably not! but that freedom of disagreement is what makes America a great country. Remember the old Soviet Union?
A sailor in the US Navy was sent to prison for taking a selfie on a submarine.
If you applied the same level of justice to Hilary Clinton she would be doing multiple life-time terms in prison.
But in this country there is no justice because the law does not apply to those like Hitlery Clinton.
Great comment
Hey Mr. Big Al,
Can you ask Helen a question for me?
Why did Goldman Suchs and other Wall Street white shoe boy firms give Hillary and Bill millions of dollars for some speeches?
What exactly did the Clintons tell them that was worth millions?
I am sure Helen can enlighten us peons.
Thank you.
I agree with you Ebolan, Al/Cory should have asked some relevant questions or at least made a pertinent point or two.
Maybe their forte is PM investing interviews.
b, my comment to Pete echo’s what I have to say to you.
If I accomplish nothing else, I will try my hardest to stress looking at both sides of an important story as this election certainly is.
Give me a break, man!
Well Al, the interview at least got a stir. Lots of input on this one.
I guess if the point was just to hear why someone would vote Clinton the object was achieved.
I dont think you can blame people for their feelings about it tho, not now that people that follow know what she is responsible for.
Its coming out now Al that she discussed the cost of transferring children, no need to say what for.
That was the exact point, b.
I certainly don’t blame anyone for their feelings, by the way!
I can easily answer that one, Eddy.
I know a number of very highly respected individuals in our industry who love the Clintons You would be very surprised at just who they are because I would guess that you listen to each and everyone of them. Look who was involved with Bill Clinton when he went down to Columbia. (Ever think about that?)
The Clintons are a very big name and some people think that being associated with them makes them look better.
That by the way, is a conclusion that the average child in first grade could figure out if they left their particular emotions out of their thinking process.
I have to add that should Mrs. Clinton get elected, what better way for an organization like Goldman and others to have admission to the White House.
The Clintons are a very big name and some people think that being associated with them makes them look better.
That by the way, is a conclusion that the average child in first grade could figure out if they left their particular emotions out of their thinking process.
Mr. Big Al Korelin,
With all due respect, that is just ridiculous.
People don’t give millions to the Clintons because it makes them look good.
Why did Goldman give millions?
The answer is simple. So they could get their people in key government positions such as in the Treasury Dept and many other gooberment agencies that supposedly regulation them.
And so they get legislation passed that will benefit them at the expense of everyone else.
Please, don’t assume the people on this blog are too stupid to understand how the system works.
Eddy, as you know I respect everyone’s particular opinion and that does not mean that I have to agree. It simply means that is what I do without emotion.
Yes, that is ridiculous. Speaking fees and book deals are payment for favors done while in office and/or for favors still to come.
nothing new matthew, the bush’s didnt speak much because of their utter stupitidy.
Is that supposed to offend me? The Bushes and the Clintons are identical in every important way. Wake up.
They’re buddies, too, btw.
Ebolan;
It’s been a long time since I have made a comment on this show and have to admit I didn’t like you but after reading your feisty grit and heart for truth and yes Hitlery should be in jail; 2016 Hillary for Prison. You are right on Eb good job. Lets do coffy as we do have lots in common. And this show is showing it’s leftist side, shame on you Al.
Pete, please be aware that a donation of $500 was made to the Trump campaign and that I voted for the man. BEFORE YOU SAY SOMETHING, PLEASE GET YOUR DAMN FACTS STRAIGHT.
You were the one that said you were prod to be friends with the like;
I myself had to disassociate with Left like minded people many in my own family; they just brought me down; every single topic was against my values and disgusted me to the core.
Agreed.
It is these people who are destroying our nations. Ostracization is a totally appropriate conduct.
I certainly do have some good friends who are liberals. So what? As Ron and Walter both said we are a one party country.
We should try very hard to change that.
You have got to be kidding me.
A priest for abortion
Foreign affair,.
30 years of corruption..
This lady might be educated,..but sure lacks wisdom…..
I personally find her to have wisdom. Agreement of disagreement is really not the issue!
I bet she loves CNN…
If that is true, I am pretty sure that the FBI will bring that out. I don’t think that folks give that organization enough credit.
If our government still works, and I believe that there are enough Americans to make it work, The FBI will not let any American be above the law.
Wisdom is..good judgement..
Thou shall not kill
You know that I certainly believe that Jerry as do all of my friends.
I personally find her to have wisdom.
Wow, I am sorry for I must be on a different planet.
To put it charitably I would say she’s ignorant.
But to put it honestly I would say she is brainwashed.
Even if she was presented with evidence of Clinton crimes I don’t she would be able to comprehend any of it.
Mr. Big Al Korelin,
I”ve got a great idea.
Bring Helen back on and let Bob Moriarty interview her.
I would like Helen to share her wisdom with Bob.
That would be a hoot!
Eddie, you rascal! 🙂
Thats funny Ebolin, I was going to post the person that should interview the woman is Bob M. Then bit my tounge
She has wisdom? WHOLLY sh!T.
great suggestion Ebolan.
Sorry Jerry I missed that, what Priest is for abortion?
OWL…..you said Worley was a priest , Worley is for Hillary which agrees and advocates late stage abortion……if she is for Hillary ,she (Worley) is for abortion.
OWL. You liked Ben Carson before ,check out his comments on late stage / abortion.
hey Jerry……nobody is for abortion, including hrc. her track record and work has actually decreased the abortion rate thru education. you do remember what it was like prior to r v w? criminalization is not the answer.
Not true Jerry. I know a lot of Catholics who are for Clinton and adamantly pro life.
Hey Bobby, HOPE all is well. I am not sure of HRC total stance on abortion. I do agree with you criminalization is not the answer.
Less Government in our lives would be fine with me.
Al your Catholic friends that are staunchly prolife cannot in good conscience be for Clinton, in fact they are guilty of scandal and formal cooperation with evil, It is impossible to hold both of those position and remain in God’s good grace. Sorry Al I am not giving my opinion, rather expressing the teachings of the Church.
This “priest for abortion” is an excellent line and entirely true. This interview is a blight on your site Al. What in the world were you thinking by putting this woman on your show to cheerlead for the wicked Clinton?
Mark, in case you don’t remember on this Show we listen to both sides of the story.
Remember Mark, we listen to everyone and then make up our own minds. That is supposedly the American way and I certainly to believe in the American Way.
I respectfully disagree with you Al in that some opinions are not worth listening to when the issue involves morality and decency. Clinton is a known liar, warmongerer, supporter of infinite government and rabid advocate of the grisly practice of killing unborn babies. If you choose to offer your show for someone to advance these hideous things that is your choice, but I maintain that it was foolish.
Even without understanding any of the details. Or shielding one’s self from all of the obvious data…..
Even a blind person could see that she lied to the FBI, she lied to Congress…..that’s at a MINIMUM.
Any of us would go to prison for same.
The many comments that have been made point to the evidence that al lot of folks who listen to these interviews will step up their anti Clinton efforts. Ever think about that?
What the H***? is that supposed to mean ?
Can you rephrase that in a way that actually says something ?
Thank you.
Leaked Clinton Foundation “Smoking Gun” Memo Reveals It Was Breaking The Law
While there are conflicting reports whether the FBI may or may not indict the Clinton Foundation, which as the WSJ reported last week is being investigated by various FBI teams, even as other parts of the Bureau – and the DOJ – seek to squash the probe, the latest dump of Podesta emails has revealed a critical, confidential memo from prominent New York lawyer Kumiki Gibson to Clinton Foundation Chairman Bruce Lindsey (and former Bill Clinton attorney) which was performed as part of an inside audit of the foundation, and confirms that the charitable organization (which it found “operates more like a political operation”) was engaged in practices that broke the law.
I am aware of that. And I repeat, we need a “court of law” and an official investigation.
Ding Ding Ding !!! Wake up call !!!
Your DOJ has been co-opted !!!!
Coffee’s on !
Not quite yet is what my research has shown me.
Lynch ? Kaczyk ?
The DOJ has been usurped. It’s up to the FBI, CIA, and god forbid, TSA now. Who’s left ?
What research you talkin bout Willis ?
It has always been the Department Of Just-us. It is incredible that so many are foolish enough to think that the Federal government has ever policed itself in a meaningful way.
Leaked Email Exposes Hillary’s Campaign Paying For Bill Clinton’s Legal Fee
Today’s latest WikiLeaks dump reveals yet another startling revelation which may add to Hillary’s growing list of alleged federal crimes. It begins with the following email from Eric Kleinfeld, of the law firm Utrecht, Kleinfeld, Fiori, Zeglis & Partners, sent to Cheryl Mills on April 15, 2015. At first glance, the email seems fairly innocuous with Kleinfeld simply seeking legal payment for services rendered for March 1, 2014 – March 31, 2015.
That said, we noticed some red flags when we looked a little deeper at the line item details of the invoice. Out of the total ~$340,000 of charges, just over $83,000 appears to be related to work done for Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.
Now, one would think that Cheryl Mills, the original recipient of the invoice, would have flagged the non-campaign charges to be paid by Bill Clinton and his various “charitable” organizations. That said, the email chain below very clearly shows that the invoice was simply escalated up the chain of command for payment.
Perhaps even more curious is the last email in the chain in which John Podesta forwards the invoice from his official “@hillaryclinton.com” email address to his “gmail” account. Why might he be so inclined to take this particular conversation offline?
The hits keep coming.
AL…I agree with you, that you should debate both sides of the argument.
You did the right thing, going on what the above comments have brought to the forum………….The honest truth.
You have just killed the Clinton campaign in the minds of the free thinkers.
Agreed IrishT. There is a lot that can be learned by looking at both sides of a discussion, and I’m always amazed when people only want to read or listen to things that they completely agree with. Often by reviewing information that one disagrees with it crystallizes one’s thoughts or responses. Many of the counter-arguments wouldn’t have happened without posting the counter-point.
correct, many party members will vote either R or D for their entire lives.
Agreed Bobby. People are brought up with conditioned belief systems (politics, religion, moral beliefs, cultural norms, sports teams to root for, etc….) that they are just convinced are 100% correct due to the reinforcement from their family, peers, church, school, and local community. Had they grown up on a different continent or culture, it is incredibly likely they’d be fighting vehemently against those exact same beliefs.
It is very rare when someone extracts themselves from their conditioned upbringing, admits that their beliefs were spoon-fed to them by people that meant well (but also never questioned the world around them), and then goes on a quest or real discovery and introspection.
It’s easy to feel vindicated in one’s belief by only reading material that they agree with or talking with people that share the same belief systems. This is how all cults and philosophies have taken hold. However, if one breaks out of their limited belief systems and expands the scope of how others view the world, society, culture, spirituality, politics, and human interaction, then one starts to gain a fresh perspective.
The others in their prior clan will resist and attack these opposing or other views, for they must defend their original tribal beliefs, but those that gain the extra perspective, then can revisit the beliefs they formerly clung to with an expanded awareness and more clarity on where their true position is seated in their consciousness.
It is much easier (and less thinking) to latch on to one’s “factor presets” and hide behind polarity consciousness where “We are right and They are wrong.”
“If you’re green you grow, if you’re ripe you rot.”
That is so very true, Exselsior.
Excelsior…..That comment says it all. you nailed it.
I kind of feel that way, Tony.
Why The Clinton Foundation Will Bring Down Hillary Clinton – Published on Nov 5, 2016
With rumbling of an upcoming FBI indictment related to the illegal activities of the Clinton Foundation, many don’t seem to understand the full stakes of unearthing this widespread corruption. Charles Ortel joins Stefan Molyneux to discuss the arguments and evidence which show the fraud and illegality of the Clinton Foundation operations.
Comey Mandates All FBI Agents Report to D.C. Offices; Prep for Raids, Possible Arrests in Clinton Probes
from True Pundit:
@sgtreport
The Conservative Case for Voting for Clinton (by David Frum)
Why support a candidate who rejects your preferences and offends your opinions? Don’t do it for her—do it for the republic, and the Constitution.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/dont-gamble-on-trump/506207/
Ah, the little Frummer Boy.
The neocon war criminal who egged Bush on in Iraq wants us to vote for Hellary.
What a surprise.
Exactly. AJ doesn’t understand that Hillary is a neocon just like Frum. People are duped so damn easily, it’s ridiculous.
You don’t think that I am completely aware of that? Come on Matthew!
AJ not AL.
Thinking is the hardest work there is,which is probably the reason why so few engage in it. -Henry Ford
Mr. Big Al Korelin,
We must be very careful when listening to people like Helen.
Everything government does is base on the coercion. Government by definition is the monopoly on the use of force.
You must follow every law, regulation, ordinance and decree and pay every tax, fee, fine and penalty that every politician and bureaucrat demands.
If you don’t, you people with guns will come to put you in a cage with possibly violent inmates and if you resist you will be killed.
We can’t deny that there is nothing voluntary about government.
With power like that corruption is inevitable.
Does Helen understand any of this?
Why should we believe anyone who is so fawning of people who will lord over us?
On November 5, 2016 at 12:27 pm,
Al Korelin says:
Cfs, have all of those allegations been proven?
Not, perhaps yet, in a court of law, but by a preponderance of the evidence……..Yes.
CFS..the allegations will never get to a court of law because of the corrupt justice system. The allegations have been proven in a court of public opinion and common sense. That is about all we have left that resembles a justice system.
HRC can be brought to Justice by any state in which the Clinton Foundation has raised money.
It does not have to be a Federal case. (As I understand the law.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnLHoqj-XRM
When brought to justice, this will be an incredible mess.
The process IS started; it will be slow, but I do not expect HRC to survive without jailtime, barring an Obama pardon. It is also not clear even Obama has the power to pardon State Justice.
Further, I am careful when I post anything on this blog, notwithstanding the use of a nom de plume I recognize fully the laws of slander and libel, and am most careful never to violate same.
If I report a “fact” I will independently verify via an independent source or make the statement of “unverified”. When I am stating an opinion, I often say “in my opinion” or add “2 cents” to indicate it is opinion.
Trump Rushed Off Stage By Secret Service At Nevada Rally
Details surrounding the event are few – according to initial reports, a person in the crowd allegedly pulled a gun – but shortly after appearing on stage at a Nevada rally, Donald Trump was rushed off stage by Secret Service agents.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-05/trump-rushed-stage-secret-service-nevada-rally
You beat me to it.
What has become of our country, Markedtofuture. A frigging gun at a political rally!
BREAKING NEWS – Donald Trump is rushed away by Secret Service while speaking during Reno rally after protester ‘with a gun’ tries to storm the stage
Donald Trump clobbered Hillary Clinton on Saturday morning for appearing with Jay-Z in Cleveland
The rapper dropped one F-bomb and N-word after another, and then Hillary embraced him onstage
Clinton has been openly critical of Trump’s ‘tone’ and the ‘lewd’ language he has used in the past
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3908378/Trump-blasts-Hillary-Jay-Z-Beyonce-concert.html
I did read about that and I am amazed that Mrs Clinton would appear on the same venue as that piece of trash! Some of the “personalities” like Jay Z illustrate just where our country has gone.
I have not always been a practicing Christian but I have been now for a number of years and I am convinced that folks like him will pay dearly in the end.
“What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that. People are going to prison.”
These are the reported words of an NYPD Police Chief. In the department, a Chief is only one rank beneath the Commissioner.
The NYPD Special Victims Unit was tasked with researching former Congressman Anthony Weiner’s laptop. It is likely that they had not idea that the sexting addict’s wife, Huma Abedin, had somehow saved emails that would expose Hillary Clinton’s career.
How bad is it? Reportedly, the information is bad enough “to put Hillary and her crew away for life.” The words were spoken to True Pundit.
I certainly hope that he does take that action.
Regarding Helen Worley.
It is important for us to know that people like this exist. Lots of them. And to realize that if Hillary were to eat a live baby on stage…….these people’s worship of her would not be shaken.
Until it’s, ” as seen on T.V.” ( coming soon )
Unfortunately I’m afraid the majority of people in this country are that way.
In my opinion the people of this country are far more brainwashed then the people of the former Soviet Union were.
They realized their government was a tragic joke and let it collapse. (Not saying what replaced it was good, just that they new what they had was horrible.)
Come on Chartster that is just stupid!
I agree, it’s stupid she actually can run for the presidency.
Al,
I’d like to hear Ms Worley’s interview in a week or two, after, Hillary is indicted. 😏
Trust me Chartster, we will have plenty of interviews if and when that happens.
Remember, remember!
The Fifth of November,
The Gunpowder treason and plot;
I know of no reason
Why the Gunpowder treason
Should ever be forgot!
Guy Fawkes and his companions
Did the scheme contrive,
To blow the King and Parliament
All up alive…..
💪👏👍 , Guy Fawkes!!
If I remember correctly, Guy Fawkes or Guy de Fawkes was French, not English.
Although the failed conspiracy to blow up Parliament was of English origin.
Of course, the plot was more religiously inspired than anti-government, in particular.James ! or 6th was not C of E, but RC.
The failure of the gunpowder plot antagonize the populace and eventually resulted in the Rouhdhead backlash a generation later and lead to the civil war.
antagonised
Paul Craig Roberts – Can The Oligarchy Still Steal The Presidential Election?
The election was set up to be stolen from Trump. That was the purpose of the polls rigged by overweighting Hillary supporters in the samples. After weeks of hearing poll results that Hillary was in the lead, the public would discount a theft claim. Electronic voting makes elections easy to steal, and I have posted explanations by election fraud experts of how it is done.
Clearly the Oligarchy does not want Donald Trump in the White House as they are unsure that they could control him, and Hillary is their agent.
With the reopening of the FBI investigation of Hillary and related scandals exploding all around her, election theft is not only more risky but also less likely to serve the Oligarchy’s own interests.
Image as well as money is part of Oligarchic power. The image of America takes a big hit if the American people elect a president who is currently under felony investigation.
Moreover, a President Hillary would be under investigation for years. With so much spotlight on her, she would not be able to serve the Oligarchy’s interests. She would be worthless to them, and, indeed, investigations that unearthed various connections between Hillary and oligarchs could damage the oligarchs.
In other words, for the Oligarchy Hillary has moved from an asset to a liability.
A Hillary presidency could put our country into chaos. I doubt the oligarchs are sufficiently stupid to think that once she is sworn in, Hillary can fire FBI Director Comey and shut down the investigation. The last president that tried that was Richard Nixon, and look where that got him.
Continued…http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-05/can-oligarchy-still-steal-presidential-election
The Clinton Connection
How Bill and Hillary raised and earned millions from Canada’s Corporate Elite
KAREN HOWLETT, JEFFREY JONES AND ANDREW WILLIS
The Globe and Mail Last updated: Friday, Nov. 04, 2016
“…. A Globe examination of Clinton Foundation documents and Bill and Hillary Clinton’s own financial disclosures reveal a web of connections into Bay Street that runs far deeper than Frank Giustra and his immediate circle.
The list of individuals and corporations with whom the Clintons have done business in the 16 years since they left the White House is a long one. The Clinton Foundation counts some of Canada’s best-known corporations – auto parts giant Magna International Inc.; mining company Barrick Gold Corp.; and Toronto-Dominion Bank – among its large donors.
Many wealthy individuals have also supported the charity. To take three examples: Lukas Lundin, chairman of the TSX-listed mining company that bears his name, donated $1-million to $5-million. Another $500,000 to $1-million came from Toronto real estate executive Michael Cooper, whose companies own a collection of prize office properties in Canada, including 50 per cent of Toronto’s Scotia Plaza. TD deputy chairman Frank McKenna, who was Canada’s ambassador to Washington when George W. Bush was president, kicked in $100,000 to $250,000.”
*Check out what the Clintons were getting paid for some of the speeches further down in the article. Not surprised, but wow….
“The NYT reports today that Former President Bill Clinton operates a foundation with Canadian mining magnate, Frank Giustra…..
Meanwhile, the Times has failed to provide some important context. Former President G.H.W. Bush, Sr. has made a personal fortune doing business with Barrick Gold, a huge Canadian mining company affiliated with the Carlyle Group.”
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389×2798911
Ah yes, the Carlyle Group. Just as corrupt.
For those that want to travel further down the rabbit hole…..
“On their payroll are people like : George Bush (Sr.), James Baker III and old premier John Major.”
“The Carlyle Group is a private investment bank which doesn’t come to the publics attention very often but it is one of the biggest American (ed: USA) investors of the defense industry, telecom, property and financial services.”
“What is the Carlyle Group? Who are the people behind the name? And how much power does Carlyle have?”
Exposed: The Carlyle Group
Shocking documentary uncovers the subversion of Americas democracy.
The Carlyle Group
From Wikipedia
Iron Triangle: The Carlyle Group
2012
“The Bush family, the Saudi Royal family, Osama Bin Laden’s family and Donald Rumsfeld’s inner circle – these are just some of the high profile figures who have played a direct role in the rise of one of the most powerful and influential and secretive firms in Washington.”
“The company is called The Carlyle Group. And in the wake of the events of September 11th and the invasion of Iraq, its power and influence have become significantly stronger.”
“The company operates within the so-called iron-triangle of industry, government and the military. Its list of former and current advisers and associates includes a vast array of some of the most powerful men in America and indeed around the world.”
“This program exposes the history of the Carlyle Group, from it’s inception as a private equity firm to it’s precent status as one of the largest defense contractors in the world.”
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/iron-triangle-the-carlyle-group-2/
Keep in mind that in that Documentary above only the first 1 minute and 47 seconds is in Dutch, the remaining 46 minutes is in English. It’s worth the watch.
Foreign cash to Hillary Clinton’s campaign tracked through Richmond
Hillary supporters need to wake the F up.
Here is a nice tie in with the comments above. In that article tracking the funds into the Clinton campaign look who shows up:
Other foreign donors include the following:
– Booz Allen Hamilton (now owned by The Carlyle Group)
– Frank Giustra, a Canadian billionaire who made a windfall profit in 2006 after landing a huge uranium contract from Kazakhstan’s authoritarian President Nursultan Nazarbayev with Bill Clinton’s help.
– Newmont Mining Corp. (major gold mining company)
* Also a funny line from the end of that article:
” It was not murder and mayhem in Chicago that got Al Capone convicted but his sloppy accounting practices that landed him and his ledger books in hot water with the Internal Revenue Service. If only old Al had a private email server.”
Excelsior, another well timed political connected adventure is the making of Barrick Gold .
Inside story: the Bush gang and Barrick Gold Corporation by Anton Chaitkin
Yes I remembered hearing about the Bush / Barrick connection back at the time, but I was less interested in mining stocks in the late 90’s and didn’t fully grasp the connections that Peter Munk had. The Papa Bush (and Grandad Bush) were two scary dudes involved in all kinds of cronyism, slush funds, and were roiled with deals with the Saudis for Oil & Resources & Defense deals through a number of corrupt businesses (like the Carlyle Group), so this Barrick connection isn’t surprising at all.
__________________________________________________________________________
from that article:
“George Herbert Walker Bush, whose father was a partner in the powerful London-controlled private banking firm Brown Brothers Harriman. Relevant to the Barrick story, Bush was U.S. vice president and chief of covert operations in the Reagan-Bush (1981-89) administration, and U.S. President (1989-93). As a former President and power broker, Bush is Barrick Gold Corp.’ s chief lobbyist, a stockholder in Barrick, and honorary senior adviser to Barrick’s international advisory board.
Adnan Khashoggi, a Bush-allied Saudi billionaire and arms trafficker, founder of the Barrick Gold Corp.; famous for his illegal weapons sales to Iran.
Peter Munk, a business failure who became a protege of the British royal family, and Khashoggi’s partner. Munk is chairman of Barrick Gold Corp.
Brian Mulroney, Canadian prime minister (1984-93) and George Bush’s errand boy; Barrick Gold lobbyist and director, Bush’s lieutenant on the Barrick international advisory board.
“Khashoggi and his associates, backers of the British- and Bush-linked faction of the arms trade, created Barrick Petroleum Corp. in 1981, registered as a Delaware, U.S.A., corporation. Junior partner Munk, having returned from London, set up a parallel “Barrick Resources” in Canada.
“But Munk’s name was anathema to Canadian investors. So, Khashoggi was brought in to lend his prestige to Munk. Khashoggi made a televised publicity tour of the Toronto stock exchange, and announced that he had purchased 10,000 (Canadian) Barrick shares. At that point, in fact, Khashoggi, his brother, and their international associates already controlled the company, partially through Khashoggi’ s Liechtenstein- U.S.A. conglomerate, ‘Triad.”
“Munk was now launched as a corporate chairman in Canada. But this first Barrick, an oil development firm, went bust and lost all its money.”
“In 1983, the Khashoggi-led group formed the gold company whose name was soon changed to Barrick Gold Corp. Sheik Kamal Adham was reportedly one of the new company’s founding co-owners. Adham, the chief of Saudi intelligence, had coordinated royalist guerrillas in Yemen, with British arms secretly provided through Khashoggi.”
“Beginning in 1985, Khashoggi borrowed $21 million, using his Barrick stock as collateral, for the covert transfer of arms to Iran for the Bush-North group, during an official U.S. arms embargo against the Khomeini regime. Khashoggi made Donald Fraser, the Toronto-based businessman who allegedly provided the loan from his Cayman Islands company, president of Khashoggi’ s Triad American holding company. Khashoggi used the Monte Carlo office of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International to launder money for Iran arms sales. Barrick Gold Corp. co-founder Kamal Adhamwas later prosecuted for fraud in the BCCI case, and paid a $100 million fine.”
“Khashoggi’s Saudi royal piggybanks also underwrote George Bush’s Central American “Contras” adventures, making payments through the Swiss Bank Corp. and a Cayman Islands bank, totalling about $27 million.”
“When the Iran and Contra scandals blew up in 1986, U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese linked the two scandals in a Nov. 25 public revelation. The next day, Munk announced a shareholders’ meeting to decide on an urgent restructuring plan. A new organization emerged, keeping the Khashoggi group in control, but easing Khashoggi out of the limelight and making Munk the sole public figurehead. Personnel were shifted into the Canada organization out of Khashoggi ‘s Triad operations in Utah. Tariq Kadri, Khashoggi’s longtime attorney, was made president of the Horsham holding company that was put over Barrick.”
“As the U.S. Congress took up the arms-for-drugs investigation and other trails leading to Vice President Bush, Khashoggi became too hot for the Canadian partnership, and the Khashoggi group’s shares were officially sold off. Khashoggi was himself arrested in 1989, in a fraud case involving the Philippines’ Marcos regime. Taken from Switzerland and jailed in New York, Khashoggi was bailed out with a $4 million check from his partner, Peter Munk.”
Bush cashes his gold chips
“In 1986-87, at the height of the Iran-Contra controversy, the Barrick Gold Corp. acquired the Goldstrike property in Nevada for $63 million. The land, proving to hold $10 billion in gold, was the property of the U.S. government. Bush was elected President in 1988, and his administration put through a special dispensation-applied only to the Barrick Gold Corp.-to speed up the normal procedures for a mining company to take official title (“patent”) to the land.”
“With the Bush Goldstrike intervention, Barrick Gold shot up from insignificance, to world power status, and Bush himself climbed onboard.(Bush told the American public, in an interview in the Dec. 1, 1996 Parade Magazine Sunday supplement: “I don’t join boards of directors, and I don’t go into business deals.”
“Yet, on Sept. 17, 1996, less than three months earlier, Bush had flown into Elko, Nevada, on a Barrick corporate jet. Bush’s international advisory board convened at Barrick’s Goldstrike property, and met with Barrick’s directors. Speaking to an audience gathered to honor his presence at the mine, Bush said, “There is no such thing as an imperial, formal ex-Presidency. We just go back and live like the rest of you.”
———————————————————————————————————————
[The rest of the article shows how Bush and Barrick used it’s government influencers to capitalize on the BLM, permitting, royalties, etc…. Typical cronyism]
Thanks Excelsior, I believe that I stated with, without naming names, already. I am fairly familiar with this topic.
“Physical attacks on Donald Trump supporters and their personal property appear to be growing increasingly common as Election Day approaches and passions intensify.”
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/trump-surge-freakout-anti-trump-violence-growing-rapidly/
Leaked transcripts from a closed-door fundraiser reveal former president Bill Clinton privately agreeing with one of Republican nominee Donald Trump’s major campaign themes: the political system is rigged against working class Americans.
The depiction of Thanatos there is appropriate.
“According to Sigmund Freud, humans have a life instinct—which he named “Eros”—and a death drive, which is commonly called (though not by Freud himself) “Thanatos”.”
When I was recently in Seattle, a guy dressed as the Grim Reaper was walking down a street and yet few seemed to notice since it was near Halloween. I looked at him, we made eye contact and he walked right towards me. Death stopped briefly and put his hand on my shoulder, and he said, “Relax, it’s not your time yet.”
My lady asked what he said, and when I told her, she laughed and said… well should we have another glass of wine? I agreed that we should and we toasted to the gift of life and to prosperity.
May everyone have a very prosperous rest of 2016 regardless of what the decision is next week. Cheers!
First, it is my understanding the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursue
tax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility based
in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Secondly, its operations have never been controlled by independent trustees.
Thirdly, its financial results have never been properly audited by
independent accountants.
Inter Alia, The IRS code is quite explicit on the requirements needed for a charity:
IRC 501(c)(3) requires an organization to be both “organized” and “operated” exclusively for one or more IRC 501(c)(3) purposes.
If the organization fails either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt. Reg. 1.501(c)(3)–1(a)(1).
The organizational test concerns the organization’s articles of organization or comparable governing document.
The operational test concerns the organization’s activities. A failure or incorrect statement of organization in the “charity’s” governing document would not appear to be cured by the organization’s actual operations.
Further, an “charity” whose activities are not within the statute will not qualify for
exemption by virtue of a well written charter. Reg. 1.501(c)(3)–1(b)(1)(iv).”
The Clinton Foundation appears to fail BOTH with regard to its organization and with regard to its operation.
At the Federal level it has been given a pass by the corrupt Obama Department of Justice AND the IRS.
At the New York state level it has been given a pass by the Democratic dominated state administration.
It would appear, however, to have been used to launder money and evade Federal taxation by both HRC and WJC in their receipt of money or fees charged by their “pay for play” activities.
Can you verify this? Has any other body raised these questions and, if so, which ones?
I have cited the relevant sections of the IRS CODE, with which I am quite familiar, having been involved in both 501c3 and 501c4 s before.
I and no one else except the IRS and hackers have access to the specific filings of the Clintons. But we do have access to public statements and official public records of the Clinton Foundation. ( Especially of the donors to the Clinton Foundation.)
I can categorically state that there are substantial deviations between donor statements and Clinton Foundation statements. With regard to a choice of which to believe, I would pick a donor statement wherein there is no motivation to lie, above that of the Clinton Foundation, where hiding theft or failing to account appropriately is clear motivation for lying.
There is multiply repeated evidence of quid pro quo behavior or pay to play behavior.
This is not a one-off occurrence, but standard behavior for HRC and WJC.
There have been several journalists and concerned citizens looking into the corruption, most notably Charles Ortel and Alex Jones.
I am not aware of an official FBI Investigation yet, but have heard that state investigations are under way in Texas and just starting in New York.
One person that have NOT seen posting on this commentary is Ms. Worley herself.
That is to be expected. Typical socialist.
Spew their lies from some self appointed position of “holier than thou” ignorance, then bolt to avoid any challenges.
Typical hit and run.
None of these people ever stick around to try to argue facts, as they know that they don’t have a leg to stand on, and don’t want to risk having their delusions jarred by any glimpses of reality.
Propaganda….pure and simple. It seems to work to recruit more low IQ masses.
That is certainly true. Note that Brad has also not posted.
You seem to imply that there have been many comments here challenging Mr. Howard’s position.
Are you on the right thread ?
For anyone interested, Bill Whittle and Stephan Molyneux had an excellent discussion on r vs K gene selection theory, pretty much exactly one year ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY-ueR0OLlQ
Offers a very plausible explanation for the differences between socialists and libertarians (no, not Gary Johnson), and how the “moods” of the masses can quickly change between the two.
I found the discussion at the above link to be very interesting. An hour and a half long though.
“r/K selection theory describes two environmental extremes, and the strategies a population will produce to exploit each extreme. As a result of these strategies, each of these two environments will produce a very particular psychology in the individuals exposed to them.”
http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory/rk-selection-theory/
Thanks for that post Matthew.
That r/K evolutionary psychology behind politics on the pacifist herd mentality with the perception of unlimited resources versus the competitive mentality for limited resources; and the differences in raising children was very intriguing. I saved the whole article to show to people at a later date. Very interesting.
Thank you Matthew.
Yes, that is the “source”. And thank you for the summary.
CME raised COMEX 100 Gold futures (GC) maintenance margins by 11.1 percent to $6,000 per contract from $5,400 for Nov. and Dec. 2016
CME raised COMEX 5000 Silver futures (SI) maintenance margins by 10.5 percent to $5,800 per contract from $5,250 for Nov. and Dec. 2016
the rates were effective after the close of business on Nov. 3
Final Thoughts for me:
I will see how the losers react to the results of the voting, before I decide where I will be living my final days. This country not unlike this site (KER) has no semblance of unity.
This thread show me quite a lot about what we are in for. Ignorant people (jump to conclusions regarding Big Al, vote) anger, hatred, dominates the voters for DT. Sorry to see you in the group Al. November 9th is going to be a frightful day for these united states whom ever wins.
When you have a large group of three thinkers you will always have did unity, Dr. I personally find that to be a good thing.
interesting interview with bill and jim. start around 33:38 and i am in no way a hunter supporter.
http://usawatchdog.com/bill-holter-and-jim-sinclair-get-ready-crash-after-election/#more-18077
I wonder Helen Worley’s view of:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-05/leaked-clinton-foundation-smoking-gun-memo-reveals-it-was-not-compliance-law
This is the best political add I’ve ever seen. Trump will crush the oligarchy and bring back a constitutional republic!! He exposes everyone! The truth resonates with the people.
Criminal President Obama Encourages Illegal Aliens to Vote – Promises No Repercussions (VIDEO)
For more than two years in this forum, I have been questioning whether the Big Zero was attempting to destroy this country as we knew it. Sadly, it would appear he is about to succeed or, perhaps, even has succeeded. Whether such a brilliant experiment in control of government excess via a representative republic can be saved only the future will tell.
I pray that justice will ultimately give Obama the fate he deserves.
Chelsea Clinton’s Husband Used Clinton Foundation To Raise Cash For His Hedge Fund
“Marc mez[vinsky] had an idea to put together a poker night for the foundation to raise money. His raising money for his own fund hasn’t been going well and he has cvc [Chelsea Clinton] making some calls for him to get mtgs with some clinton people.”
Snippet….In 2012, Mezvinski, the husband of Chelsea Clinton, created a $325 million basket of offshore funds under the Eaglevale Partners banner through a special arrangement with investment bank Goldman Sachs. The funds have lost tens of millions of dollars predicting that bailouts of the Greek banking system would pump up the value of the country’s distressed bonds. One fund, exclusively dedicated to Greek debt, suffered near-total losses.
A quick note here on what Mezvinsky’s biggest seed investor: Goldman Sachs. Recall that when Chelsea Clinton’s husband sought funding for his new hedge fund, he found financial backing from one of the biggest names on Wall Street: Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein. Blankfein not only personally invested in the fund, but allowed his association with it to be used in the fund’s marketing.
The decision for Blankfein to invest in Hillary Clinton’s son-in-law’s company is just one of many ways Goldman Sachs has used its wealth to forge a tight bond with the Clinton family. The company paid Hillary Clinton $675,000 in personal speaking fees, paid Bill Clinton $1,550,000 in personal speaking fees, and donated between $250,000 and $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. At a time when Goldman Sachs directly lobbied Hillary Clinton’s State Department, the company routinely partnered with the Clinton Foundation for events, even convening a donor meeting for the foundation at the Goldman Sachs headquarters in Manhattan.
Finally, in May 2016, Mezvinsky shut down Eaglevale’s Greek fund after losing 90% of its assets in early 2015. It is unclear if he has since resorted to using the Clinton Foundation to fund more cash.
That is clearly not illegal, he simply took advantage of his contacts. Nothing that any other hedge fund manager; stockbroker; ; or, investment banker would not do.
Stop and think about that.
Big Al, I was under the impresion that leaking insider information was illegal.
From the article….In an email from January 18, 2012, Doug Band tells John Podesta and Cheryl Mills that “Marc mez[vinsky] had an idea to put together a poker night for the foundation to raise money. His raising money for his own fund hasn’t been going well and he has cvc [Chelsea Clinton] making some calls for him to get mtgs with some clinton people.”
What Band was accusing “Mez” of doing is that since he was unable to raise cash for his hedge fund on his own, he came looking for the help of his wife, Chelsea, who is Vice Chairman of the Foundation bearing her last name.
Band then says that “Marc has invited several potential investors and a few current business ones to the poker night. I assume all are contributing to the foundation, which of course isn’t the point. What is the point is that he is doing precisely what he accused me of doing as the entire plan of his has been to use this for his business which he is.”
And there you have another Pay-to-Play smoking gun: an extended Clinton family member using Bill’s (and Chelsea’s) “last name” connections to raise money for his business.
Needless to say, the idea worked: as Fox previously reported, in April 2012, Eaglevale booked $19 million from a dozen investors. California’s public employee pension fund, CalPERS, reportedly invested $13 million. Goldman Sach’s CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, jumped in with his own money, as did Chelsea Clinton’s former boss, Marc Lasry, who specializes in buying distressed debt.
In retrospect it appears that while we have no reason to doubt the sincerity of the relationship between Mezvinsky and Chelsea, the former clearly saw some prominent fringe benefits, namely the ability to fall back on the latter’s last name to “raise money” through the Clinton Foundation, after his own fundraising efforts were falling short.
Another fringe benefit was to use Chelsea Clinton as a conduit for confidential information on Greek bailout talks coming directly from the US State Department, whose head – and top US diplomat – at the time was Hillary Clinton. As Fox previously reprorted, In May 2012, Sid Blumenthal, emailed two “confidential” memos about the Greek debt situation to Clinton. Hormats was included in the email loop.
Mr. Big Al Korelin,
Please listen to the first five minutes of this and then tell me you do not thing that Hillary Clinton is not a criminal.
I do believe personally that she has broken the law by usurping (disregarding) what I understand to be governmental regulations. That is something that my earlier research has shown me.
Once you relinquish your soul to the devil and the satanic paganism associated with this,the extent of your evil and misdeeds knows no boundaries.
For those that have not been following Wikileaks and HRC’s lack of honesty and moral behavior, this will get you up to date:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSmOWMii71E
I am curious as to what your predictions are for this election.
Note: I am asking who you THINK WILL WIN, not who you WANT TO WIN.
My prediction is that Shillary will win.
My guess is Trump’s vote total ranges from about 75% of what McCain got to about 110% of what Romney got, probably in the low end of that range which means a Shillary landslide.
My guess is the Demonrats win back the Senate but not the House.
I base this on the fact that the majority of Amerikans are brainwashed sheep. There are tens of millions of Helens out there. Why do you think the country is so F’d up now? In my opinion there is no need for vote rigging (although it may occur anyway).
Note: I don’t want Shillary to win and anyone who has read my posts should know that.
Maybe I ask this question again Tuesday to see if anyone changes their mind if any more damaging info comes out. My guess is that if nothing more comes out today that will probably be it before the election.
If you are asking me Eddy, I think that Donald Trump will win and by a larger margin than most people today think.
it is easier to predict who will lose, than who will win.
The American people will lose.
another coverage of the situation:
https://youtu.be/uZ45F4iYQi8
From what Ive been reading Trump should win.
What we are going to find out is if the “elites” still want Clinton with her mounting baggage, if they do, it will be rigged as we have seen in Texas.
Machines counting Trump votes for Clinton, as we had explained to us.
Courtroom Testimony on Rigged Voting Machines
https://youtu.be/rVmsaDS_FwY
even the average Brit gets it….
My guess is at this point any new information from Wikileaks that comes out won’t make any difference.
I think the only thing that has the possibility to make a difference is action such as the FBI arresting Abedin or the FBI raiding one of Clinton’s properties but I don’t see that happening.
You might find this guy interesting.
Steve Pieczenik
https://youtu.be/CJ_CYS-KMjM
He talks about members of the government that are dealing with Clinton and the corruption, a coup.
They probably told him to make sure his insurance policy is up to date. Jimmy the weasel
LOL
Clinton Campaign Worried About A “Whopper Of A Wikileaks In Next Two Days”
“Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days – it’s probably a fake.”
Armstrong – FBI Clears Hillary for Mishandling Classified Emails – AGAIN
FBI Director James Comey released an official statement saying that with respect to Hillary, “we have not changed the conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.” There would be no new charges regarding “mishandling” of classified documents.
The real story will be the Clinton Foundation. That is what could lead to TREASON. It is the only possible avenue that I would see that could lead to charges against Hillary. As I stated earlier, there is no way to impeach a president for acts PRIOR to taking office. They would have to charge her, put her on trial, and imprison her BEFORE inauguration to stop her. That just does not seem likely even if Comey had the evidence. It means nothing since she has been nominated as the Democratic candidate.
Despite all the hoopla, there was really nothing Comey could have done to stop Hillary. All the criticism hurled at him was partisan. According to sources, what evidence exists in the emails point more to corruption and the pay-for-play. That can lead top Treason if she is taking money from people who fund our enemies. That is the conflict of interest and Comey has not cleared anyone of that. Would he bring this charge up? Probably not given the state of wholesale corruption we are witnessing in politics.
I still “believe” that they will rig the election to prevent a Trump victory despite the fact that our computer projects a Trump victory and more importantly, that this is a major clash with people who want their country back. Already, Texas has broken all records for the number of people coming out to vote early. This seems to confirm our computer will be right on that forecast that this should be the biggest turnout for the past 23 elections.
Our computer has NEVER been wrong except one time – the election of 2000. There the Supreme Count handed the election to Bush and would not wait for a recount, which ultimately showed Gore should have won. So a Clinton victory will send us into war and the economy down hard and dirty. That appears to be more likely from the market perspective with the bubble top in bonds. But this will be a rigged outcome and that will send what she calls the “deplorables” into rising civil unrest.
Thanks for the Worley interview. It shows you are intellectually interested in what the other side has to say and you acted fair minded throughout the interview itself letting her speak her complete thoughts. And then you did not same with Brad Howard to get the Republican side. Brave, an example of civilized discussion in a completely uncivil election.
Well, Well, Well.
As it turns out, I have been dead wrong about the Clintons. Ms. Worley has been absolutely correct…..at least about the e-mail scandal(s).
It seems that Mr. James Comey (previously on the board of directors of HSBC bank), being the superhero that he is…..has personally gone through the 650,000 newly found e-mails very very very very quickly (and thoroughly), and found absolutely nothing amiss.
Ms. Clinton can once again proudly take up the throne of most ethically and morally just leader.
Wikileaks Releases 8,200 Emails From DNC Hack; Reveals Collusion Between CNN And Democrats 55,730 NOV 6, 2016 9:30 PM
Moments ago, Wikileaks announced the release of another huge batch of hacked DNC emails, which it dubbed #DNCLeak2, contained some 8,263 previously unseen, hacked DNC emails going public for the first time.
In an April 2016 email from DNC research director Lauren Dillon, we find that CNN’s Wolf Blitzer had tasked the DNC with coming up with questions for his interview of Donald Trump:
Wolf Blitzer is interviewing Trump on Tues ahead of his foreign policy address on Wed.
Please send me thoughts by 10:30 AM tomorrow.
Thanks!
The DNC was quick to oblige, even if ultimately the interview ended up getting cancelled.
RE: Trump Questions for CNN
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-06/wikileaks-releases-8200-new-emails-dnc-hack
The inner workings of a mysterious off-the-books arm of the Clinton Foundation were partially revealed in the hacked emails of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.
The little-known Haiti Development Fund, an LLC incorporated in Delaware in August 2010, was created by the Clinton Foundation with an initial endowment of $20 million from shady Canadian mining mogul Frank Giustra and Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim.
The Fund was supposed to supply desperately needed seed money to Haitian entrepreneurs after an earthquake devastated the country in January 2010.
But The Post found only one project that it funded with a fraction of the start-up cash.
Since the Fund is incorporated as a private entity and not a non-profit, it is not subject to the same disclosure rules as a public charity.
And the Clinton Foundation never disclosed the Fund as a “related entity” on its tax filings as required by IRS rules. It was only after the Clinton Foundation, under mounting scrutiny and media pressure, “voluntarily” decided to refile five years’ worth of tax returns in 2015 that the Fund appears on the forms.
The for-profit Fund was managed by Jean Marc Villain, who was going through a bankruptcy in 2010 when he was working for the Clinton Foundation. The non-profit paid him an annual salary of $100,000 to oversee the Fund, according to pay records attached to the Podesta emails.
Source. Drudge and NY Post.
Hmmmm….wonder if any of these “slipped” past Mr. Comey during their exhaustive reviews.
Total disbelief…Bill Holter Posted November 6th, 2016 at 12:25 PM
I must apologize for being scarce over the last few days, I have been in Munich Germany speaking at a gold conference. I did two interviews and one Q+A session. Hopefully we will have 2-3 links leading you to my speaking engagements early this coming week. At this point, I can only pray to God that I land in Texas and return to my family before the pending news blows the doors off the world. Apparently news will come out in the next 24 hours that is so far beyond belief the average person will not believe it even with pictures provided. I have spoken of “truth bombs” for close to two years now. I must confess, it was my original belief the truth bomb to come was 9/11 centric and Mr. Putin would be the author. I now am understanding that even WikiLeaks and Anonymous are shocked with what is allegedly coming out. My only fear is that the news may be so far over the top that no one believes it because “it cannot” be true … even in a Stephen King novel.
Due to technical problems, our interview will not be posted until late Monday or early Tuesday. It is my understanding that even the police are blown away with what they have found relating to satanic rituals, pedophilia, not to mention fraud and outright treason. I had previously lowered my guess as to odds of the election NOT being held over the last couple of weeks as we got closer and closer to 11/8. I now believe the odds are greatly raised and now higher than ever before. If what I believe to be coming out in the next 24 hours does actually materialize, our world will have immediately changed and game over scenario will arrive without any notice. I am trying to authenticate/verify what my understanding is because it is far beyond what anyone can bring themselves to even contemplate. I will try to provide more guidance on Monday after my return. In the meantime, make sure you have finalized any and all preparations as confidence may very well be shattered beyond anything previously imaginable. I believe you will fully understand what I speak of prior to my next post on Monday. May God bless each and every one of his children!
Standing watch in total disbelief,
Bill Holter
Holter-Sinclair collaboration
From Bob Moriarty:
http://www.321gold.com/editorials/moriarty/moriarty110716.html
To hell with Ms. Worley and her ilk.
Moriarty tells it like it is.
“Hillary Clinton isn’t just stupid and corrupt. She is evil. In any fair election she couldn’t be elected as chief scarecrow for an Arkansas cornfield but there is a great chance she will be both the next and the last American President. She intends to steal the election.”
It’s so refreshing to hear someone state the truth plainly. I guess that’s why people like Trump, despite his shortcomings.
My condolences Mr Moriarty.
My condolences also.. tragic!!
Bob M. …just heard of your family loss….my thoughts and prayers go out in this sorrowful time , may God comfort you and your family at this tragic time.
Al, I apologize to say this about a friend of yours, but that woman’s infatuation with [Horrible] Hillary was about enough to make one sick… Sounded like she was from some kind of cult. There are a few regulars on your show that I don’t care to listen to, but (I think I can honestly say) if KE Report had guests like that on every week, I probably wouldn’t bother to listen.
Wow, I just got through listening to Helen Worley. I am no fan of Donald Trump (I can’t stand the man) but she is probably the most biased and worst guest I have ever heard interviewed on your show. Joseph Goebbels would be proud. Al, you can do better than this. Why such a soft serve? If I want to listen to people like her or Donna Brazille, I can listen to CNN.
Thank you for presenting Ms Worley,s opinion of Hillary Clinton. She sounds quite intelligent.
Amazing !
It is important for us to know that people like this exist. Lots of them. And to realize that if Hillary were to eat a live baby on stage…….these people’s worship of her would not be shaken.