Same to you Jerry… And all the Christian bloggers here…

ALL GOOD TO YOU ! Cory Jerry Tommy ! Stay Strong !

More Gas……… for the fire…….. They should have never blown up the pipeline in the East….

Hello Irish……. hoping you are doing fine….

The Green Agenda Don’t Won’t GAS ! Happy Jesus Day Irish !

…don’t worry, Tony…Uncle Joe is on the way…he and KamalToe and Booty Jig will fix it right up.

Next week, President Biden will travel to the Francis Scott Key Bridge.

…you will eat zee bugs…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM5KrMTGGl0

Thanks Ebolan… Good data from one practice and a good challenge by Kirsh for other practices to share their data.

CFS worked overtime yesterday… He deserves a day off.😊

It was a Good Friday for insane seniles.
.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2024/03/29/a-proclamation-on-transgender-day-of-visibility-2024/
.

Hah…he’s got Gary North on….

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/03/21/empire-of-lies/

The White House Occupants are currently lying scum.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9ILghHJT4M
.
Please note:
I did not say Trump was always truthfull. He has faults.
But Biden’s and their cohorts are vindictive crooks, taking bribes,lying, cheating…….as often as not.

This is what “Judeo-Christianity” looks like in practice. This is what happens when you let Zionists (Jewish nationalists) run your country. This is what happens when you tolerate evil. The fundamental battle and choice of our age is simple: are you are Christian or are you a Judeo-Christian? Are you a Christian Nationalist or are you a Zionist? Is your loyalty with Christ or is your loyalty with Christ-denying Jews? Those are the options for us as Christians. Battle lines

They went to the TOMB….. and HE was not there…………
Paul’s message was real clear….
Gal. 3 Verses 28 to 29
[28] There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

. the 501 3b crowd… are a little lacking in knowledge…
the word has been perverted..

Hosea 4:6
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUMsaDgL8O4

There are lots of Christmas movies, but what is everyone’s favorite Easter movie ?
.
e.g.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZS_OcIcRem4
.I did not choose a historical one.

ALL CONGRESS needs to GO…………… one big joke at this time….
Worthless……
. signs of the BEAST…….. of course if, one does not believe in GOD … then how does one believe in
the devil… 🙂

this is not directed at anyone in particular……..

Sheeple are livestock… Animal disease traceability… Pandemic control… Quarantine camps… Forced medical interventions… For everyone’s safety.

While I would agree that water can stick to a “pinning ball” and would cite the earth as an example; I would disagree that “ships can melt steel bridges”, although their cargo might,

Jerry, your guess is as good as mine as to how much is accurate.

Ya gotta wonder tho.

“Amazon’s palm scanning app is a step in the direction of digital identity,” he continued, adding that the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the Swiss-based financial institution colloquially referred to as the “bank for central banks,” has stated that a “digital identity scheme” is a prerequisite for effective CBDCs.

“The BIS has also admitted that CBDCs allow complete transaction transparency,” he said. “Hinging access to money on a digital identity inclusive of a complete (political) profile–one can easily imagine the Orwellian possibilities that this would entail.”

“It represents the closing of the totalitarian circle.”

….everybody has influence over Amerocon policy….except us…we just get to pay for it all…

…dang…if interest rates stay where they are the feral gooberment will have to pay $2 trillion in interest…according to skiff…that’s more than what the feral gooberment spends on socialist insecurity…GOOBERMENT DEBT IS COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTROL…AND THINGS ARE ONLY GETTING STARTED!!!!

Charster, why do you continue to post your flat earth nonsense?
Much like your predictions for the price of Gold, if you believe the earth is flat, so be it.
We’ve read your senseless nonsense about D Trump, Q Anon, Gitmo, pedo’s and the like.
Until any of us can afford to buy a rocket and travel into space, we all will have to be content with what we don’t know including you.
Do yourself a favor and read a book.

Chartster, you forgot East and West as well. Now go find your helmet and go for a bicycle ride.

Give it a rest Chartster.
Realistically who else is going to run the financial system ?
The Politicians that hold office presently?
The Public was crying for financial reform when the Fed was created.
The same thing will happen again.
Greed is inherent to man.

Love Martin Armstrong.
Got Gold? How about silver?
$26.75 on the futures. How long before the limits?

Ding Dong.
Not everything I’ve read is false. Not everything we know is untrue.
Human Nature is flawed.
Try this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e82ZGu0ltYs&t=2022s

I am viewing that tape at this moment…..

Question
1. at the 5:19 mark…. “they (the bad guys) worked in defending NASA”
SO, if they the cabal worked at defending NASA,…. and you say NASA is a lie, then
the narrator needs to get up to speed with the flat earthers….hummm

2. go to the 8:54 min mark… again… space opportunities for the good guys… humm

Other than that…. the tape was IMO….good … but, nothing new…

Good one Irish.
I say they have a doped up Olympics.
See how fast people can run on performance enhancing drugs.

China……. is in big problems… with employment……… 48% unemployment for youths….

good one ……. sheeple do not have a clue… they like paying income tax…. and being scared by the daily
boogie man on the radio…

Peter three times denied the Lord (Matthew 26), saying he did not know
Him because he knew that that person was not Christ.

Thats a dif between myself and most christians, I believe Peter, christians think he lied.

My reasoning can not be found in the bible(as far as I can recall) the answers are in other book discussing the matter.

Obviously it was decided not to include the info for who knows why?

After all…….. Hollywood…is part of the Satan society….. MK ultra for the sheeple…

Newsflash Irish.
The fishing in Minnesota is terrible.
Go to either Canada or Alaska.

Thanks John…….
On your comment…. “many…. on Brics…. to the dollar.”

There are a few , who think the dollar has a long way to go… before it is eliminated…
I think I have to go along with some of their thinking…. the dollar is not going away
over night… I think we have a few more years .. there is no alternative… at this moment.
Digital currency and control… with the NWO…
Bezo, is promoting the hand print on the phone… I have stopped using everything Bezo…
screw Prime and Wholefoods….

What are you seeing in your area for junk …. spot plus premiums…. ?

Just 90%…

Still able to find a few Canadian pennies. Whether or not they will be worth anything is anybody’s guess.

Canadian paper is not popular in the states.. …
Kind of a side issue, where you have to be informed and educated , what is what…
The majority (not all)of store owners , here in my area,… really are not that educated on
anything…. or they are just playing dumb….

Will happen when enough , have had it…………..

Only the little people pay taxes… lol…. or those without income…. lol
IRS, is keeping your money safe off shore… lol
Do not forget to file… APRIL 15…. witching hour… lol
Did we hire those 80,000 new hires with guns , yet…lol
Heck, they do not need the money,… they can just print it…lol

👍

ditto

GREAT POST………….. thanks Irish………

Hello Irish……….. thanks for the added info…. Hope all is going well….

Your silver is getting a good bid…. looking good…..hoping this is the turn
to go up and break $49

Good sign on the street… the newbies are dumping … lowest premium in a few years.. jmo

Only the flat earth Priests have the details on how the sun and moon travel through the firmament… Rather than believe the science behind round earth, gravity, and orderly celestial movements, you must have faith that these priests have it all figured out… Just not good to disclose details to the sheeple… Gee-whiz… Flat earth sounds like a cult to me.

REPOST…………… JUST A QUESTION………..and Not trying to put you on the spot….thanks
OOTB Jerry
Apr 03, 2024 03:42 AM
I am viewing that tape at this moment…..

Question
1. at the 5:19 mark…. “they (the bad guys) worked in defending NASA”
SO, if they the cabal worked at defending NASA,…. and you say NASA is a lie, then
the narrator needs to get up to speed with the flat earthers….hummm

2. go to the 8:54 min mark… again… space opportunities for the good guys… humm

As the great Mark Twain said, if you don’t read the US media you are uninformed. If you do follow America’s media, you are misinformed.

So EBO … It would appear that the picture you posted above , is indeed the truth. I was warning about how dangerious this tribe was , about 10 years ago , on this blog.

Hi SF…. Jimmy the uniform wearing pen pusher , was wrong about Ukraine from day one. Everyone on this blog , knew more than he did…… He was a milatery brainwashed sap.

Jim McKinney lacked the ability of critical thinking past his and the CIA failure to shove NATO down Putin’s throat in Georgia.
Al did us a disservice by shoving his crap down our throats.
Of course I never heard Al object to killing people in the name of Democracy as well.

LOL…………… jimmy…. go man go….

Ditto….. It did…….. I will just print it… 🙂
“Conspiracy” Is Not a Real Crime, and Trump Isn’t Guilty of It
Trump
04/03/2024
•
Mises Wire
•
Ryan McMaken
Print this page
Last month, former president Donald Trump succeeded in indefinitely delaying his trial on federal charges related to the January 6 riot at the US Capitol building. It is now unclear if or when he will stand trial for the federal crimes with which he was charged in August of last year.

The charges are primarily conspiracy charges. Specifically, Trump has been charged in federal court with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, one count of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, one count of conspiracy against rights of voters, plus one count of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding.

The fact that Trump is being charged with these conspiracy charges tells us how flimsy the evidence is that he actually committed any of the acts in question. That is, had Trump actually “defrauded the United States,” or violated voting rights, you can sure that he would be charged with doing so.

In lieu of charges for real crimes, Trump is charged with “conspiracy” to commit these crimes. That is, he is charged with saying things that could be construed as part of a plan to commit a crime at some point in the future. As with conspiracy crimes in general, whether or not the underlying crime ever took place is irrelevant in court. Conspiracy charges exist to create new ways for government prosecutors to indict people who haven’t actually committed the crime in question.

Rather conspiracy “crimes” are thought crimes in which a person says or thinks things that prosecutors will pretend are criminal acts. In the real world, however, “conspiracy to commit X” is not “X.”

Conspiracy versus Real Crime
Conspiracy charges are commonplace in the federal legal system. The Congressional Research Service sums up the situation, stating

The United States Code contains dozens of criminal conspiracy statutes. One … outlaws conspiracy to commit any other federal crime. The others outlaw conspiracy to commit some specific form of misconduct, ranging from civil rights violations to drug trafficking. Conspiracy is a separate offense under most of these statutes, regardless of whether the conspiracy accomplishes its objective.

This latter point is an important distinction. It is not necessary that the defendant charged with conspiracy harm anyone —i.e., that there be any actual victim. Indeed, conspiracy charges act as a way of charging individuals with crimes that might occur, but have not.

Moreover, it is not even necessary in all cases that a “conspirator” take any affirmative steps toward completion of the alleged conspiracy. While it is true that some federal conspiracy statutes “require at least one conspirator to take some affirmative step in furtherance of the scheme.” It is also the case that “Many have no such explicit overt act requirement.” Even in those cases where some “affirmative step” or overt act take place, it is not necessary that the act be illegal. The “act” could be publicly stating an opinion or making a phone call.

In a 2019 interview, Judge Andrew Napolitano highlighted some problems with conspiracy charges:

If it were up to me, there would be no such thing as conspiracy crimes because they are thought crimes and word crimes. But, at the present time in our history and in fact, for all of our history, regrettably, an agreement to commit a felony, agreement by two or more people or two or more entities to commit a felony and a step in furtherance of that agreement, constitutes an independent crime. … In the world of freedom, where you and I and people reading this live, conspiracy is a phony crime. For 600 years of Anglo-American jurisprudence, all accepted definitions of crime contained an element of harm. Today, crime is whatever the government says it is.

As Napolitano correctly notes, the concept of conspiracy is relatively old in the common law in some form or another. Yet, the use of the idea in expanding federal prosecutions has grown enormously since the founding era. The Congressional Research Service’s report continues:

This is not to say that conspiracy was unknown in pre-colonial and colonial England, but simply that it was a faint shadow of the crime we now know. … The patchwork reached a point where one commentator explained that there were “few things left so doubtful in the criminal law, as the point at which a combination of several persons in a common object becomes illegal.”

That last sentence remains one of the most controversial aspects of conspiracy laws: at what point does talking and thinking about a crime becomes a criminal act? Legislators and the courts have never been able to provide any objective standard, and thus, prosecutors are afforded enormous leeway in stringing together a series of legal acts and claiming these constitute a conspiracy. The prosecutor merely need convince a grand jury that legal acts are really illegal. This is not difficult, as noted by Judge Solomon Wachtler when he cautioned that district attorneys could convince grand juries to “indict a ham sandwich.”

Not surprisingly, people who are actually concerned about regimes abusing their power have long opposed conspiracy prosecutions.

For example, Clarence Darrow wrote on conspiracy prosecutions in his 1932 biography, concluding “It is a serious reflection on America that this wornout piece of tyranny, this dragnet for compassing the imprisonment and death of men whom the ruling class does not like, should find a home in our country.”1

Darrow was at least partly joined in this opinion several years earlier by Judge Learned Hand who in 1925 described conspiracy charges as “that darling of the modern prosecutor’s nursery” for the way it favors prosecutors over defendants.

Crimes of Thought and Speech Vaguely Defined
In the wake of the Vietnam War and the federal government’s many attempts to prosecute antiwar protestors and activists for various crimes, many legal scholars took a closer look at the nature of conspiracy charges.2 Many were skeptical that conspiracy charges are either necessary or beneficial.3 Most alarming of all is the fact that the elastic and vague nature of conspiracy “crimes” means that, as Thomas Emerson puts it, “the whole field of conspiracy law is filled with traps for the unwary and opportunities for the repressor.”4

One of the more famous cases of conspiracy prosecutions running amok was the 1968 prosecution and trial of American pediatrician and antiwar activist Benjamin Spock. Spock and four others were charged with conspiring to aid, abet, and counsel draft resisters. That is, they were charged with saying things. Although prosecutors could never show the “conspirators” committed any illegal acts—or were ever even in the same room together—Spock and three of his “co-conspirators” were found guilty in federal court. The case was eventually set aside on appeal, but on a legal technicality. The federal legal doctrines underlying conspiracy charges were never in danger.

Spock was able to avoid prison, but countless others have not been so lucky. Defendants who do not enjoy Spock’s level of fame or wealth continue to find themselves locked in cages for saying things federal prosecutors don’t like.

The legal incoherence of the charges laid against Spock—and against antiwar activists in general—was covered in detail in Jessica Mitford’s 1969 book The Trial of Dr. Spock, in which she writes

The law of conspiracy is so irrational, its implications so far removed from ordinary human experience or modes of thought, that like the Theory of Relativity it escapes just beyond the boundaries of the mind. One can dimly understand it while an expert is explaining it, but minutes later, it is not easy to tell it back. This elusive quality of conspiracy as a legal concept contributes to its deadliness as a prosecutor’s tool and compounds the difficulties of defending against it.5

Mitford further draws upon Darrow to illustrates the absurdity of these prosecutions, pointing out that Darrow described conspiracy laws this way: if a boy steals a piece of candy, he is guilty of a misdemeanor. If two boys talk about stealing candy and do not, they are guilty of conspiracy—a felony.

Again, we find that the foundation of conspiracy laws are thoughts and words, rather than any actual criminal acts. Or, as Abraham Goldstein put it in 1959: “conspiracy doctrine comes closest to making a state of mind the occasion for preventive action against those who threaten society but who have come nowhere near carrying out the threat.”6

This ability to treat this “state of mind” as real crime means, in the words of Kevin Jon Heller:

the government currently enjoys substantive and procedural advantages in conspiracy trials that are unparalleled anywhere else in the criminal law. Conspiracy convictions can be based on circumstantial evidence alone, and the government is allowed to introduce any evidence that “even remotely tends to establish the conspiracy charged.”7

Conspiracy Prosecutions Are a Means of Quashing Dissent
Conspiracy laws have long been used for a wide variety of alleged crimes, especially “conspiracies” related to federal drug crimes.

However, as the Dr. Spock case makes clear, conspiracy prosecutions hare also a tool against those who protest government policies. More specifically, given that conspiracy “crimes” are essentially crimes of words and thoughts, conspiracy prosecutions have long been employed as a way of circumventing the First Amendment. As the editors of the Yale Law Journal put it in 1970: “Throughout various periods of xenophobia, chauvinism, and collective paranoia in American history, conspiracy law has been one of the primary governmental tools employed to deter individuals from joining controversial political causes and groups.”8

Or, put another way, through conspiracy prosecutions, the “government seeks to regulate associations whose primary activity is expression.”9 Naturally, citizens are more reluctant to engage in expressive activities with others that could later be characterized in court as some kind of conspiracy.

Dr. Spock in 1969 was charged with allegedly saying things to others—i.e., a type of associating with others—to supposedly encourage anti-conscription activists. Any strict interpretation of the First Amendment—which is the correct type of interpretation—would tell us that this ought to be protected speech under the First Amendment. Federal courts, however, have long disagreed.

Some advocates of conspiracy might claim that speech encouraging a specific crime ought not be protected. Yet, in real life conspiracy prosecutions, it is not easy to determine whether or not a “conspirator” is actually encouraging a specific crime. As David Filvaroff notes, the actual intent and effect of the speech is difficult to interpret. Thus, judgements about whether or not speech counts as protected speech is highly arbitrary:

With a conspiracy to murder one faces a potential crime of finite proportion and of near unmistakable content. There is little, if any, risk that either the defendants themselves, or the court or jury, will mistake the criminality of what the defendants propose to do. The probability of such a mistake both by the alleged conspirators and by the trier of fact is very high, however, in the case of conspiracy to incite.10

Plans to murder a specific person are quite different from idle talk and expressed opinions about what a person thinks ought to be done to oppose some government institution or law. Most of the time, however, it is difficult for a “conspirator” to guess how others will interpret his words and what concrete actions might take place as a result. Did the speaker intend for his opinions to incite certain actions? To “prove” this, prosecutors often rely on little more than assertions and assumptions.

Under these circumstances, innocent people can end up serving years in prison for expressing their views about what government agents or government institutions ought to do or stop doing.

Trump’s “Conspiracies”
Conspiracy law has long been a boon for federal prosecutors and this is clearly also true for Jack Smith, the special counsel attempting to try Trump on three different conspiracy charges. Smith—backed up by countless voices in the legacy media—contends that Trump is guilty of trying to unlawfully overturn the 2020 election. According to the 45-page indictment, Trump engaged in a “conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit.” The indictment also claims he engaged in a “conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede” Congress on January 6. Trump also supposedly conspired “against the right to vote.”

So, what did Trump do in carrying out these conspiracies? The indictment admits that its evidence constitutes nothing more than things Trump said. According to Smith, the “conspiracies” were “built on the widespread mistrust the Defendant was creating through pervasive and destabilizing lies.” That is, Trump publicly expressed opinions that people were free to accept or reject.

The indictment contains all the usual hallmarks of flimsy and questionable claims about criminal conspiracies. The indictment contends Trump acted together with “co-conspirators” although the so-called evidence shows no clear intent. Smith claims that Trump’s incorrect statements about the election constituted “knowingly” spreading false information. How do we know that Trump knew these statements were false? Smith simply assumes this. Essentially, Smith’s case is that Trump is guilty of conspiracy because he made a number of statements—most of them public statements told out in the open to forward this “secret” conspiracy—that were incorrect.

To reasonable people who actually take the First Amendment seriously, this should be an open and shut case. The natural right to free speech includes the right to say things and express opinions about elections. This includes statements that are wrong. In free countries, citizens are free to claim that elections are corrupt. Case closed.

The federal legal system is not so reasonable, however, and there is a good chance that Smith or some other prosecutor could convince a jury—as has happened in so many other conspiracy cases against ordinary people—that thoughts and words are not protected by the First Amendment after all.

Good write-up on conspiracy… I have always believed that in the absence of a real crime, a victim, actual harm, conspiracy can not be a crime… Free speech involving hypothetical conversation, complaints, and protest speech must never be interfered with…

John……. you have a good point……. as usual …

Donald Trump is a distraction?
My God… you people are seriously lost..

Charts are nothing more than where price has been and not where it’s going.
We are entering the final stages of the decline of the U.S economy. The GDP of the BRIC’s alliance has surpassed the United States and their allies.
Third world Countries are no longer looking at the Western financial model to bring financial prosperity and the elevation of their Countries from poverty.
You need to start looking at indicators other than price.
Much like Chartster, your prediction of a top will turn out to be as bad as those who have been predicting the crash that is yet to be seen.
Gold is your insurance policy against a declining dollar. Tell me what that chart looks like.

Hi Jerry .. Lets hope it spreads to other states. These ORGS. are a danger to people everywhere.

Like I said Irish:
The death of U S Veteran Jacob Flickenger in that food convoy that was targeted will be swept under the rug.
Basic Principles of Humanity have been thrown out the door.

And John. You look up and see the North Star every night of you life, and it never moves. Yet you continue to believe you’re on a spinning ball.

So what is your opinion? 0

isn’t Twitter……… owned by Musk the insider for the CIA,….. Musk just happened on the scene a few years back ,…. just like Bezo, Zucky and billy Gates…..

Q drops….. and numbers……. are those the signs of wonders, or of mystical BS.. which craft for dummies….(take no offence please)
We have yet………. to see the wonders of the so called “WHITE HATS”…. appear for the sheeple…
I have been saying for several YEARS…. WAITING,,WAITING and WAITING…

Within a few months………. The waiting will be OVER… elections are going to be held for a group
voting for some leadership, Which is in some party… that is suppose to rid us of these creatures
that have been ruling over us for a couple generations…
The real enemy is WHO?

Just a RANT……………. questioning minds want to know…. 🙂

Not too many people understand there is a uniparty and Trump i simply another part of it.

I think there are some people catching on but progress is slow.

imo it wont change until the empire collapses and not because people figure it out but because times will be hard.

Course maybe it doesnt change, maybe the chairs just get re-arranged, not impossible that a response to a collapse has already been planned for.

Why do you think he moved the U S embassy to Jerusalem?
Why do you think he put on a yarmulke when he isn’t Jewish?

Educate me, John
Give me detailed reasons of why.

It is time to stop paying taxes UNTIL the government gets its book in order AND POLITICIANS OBEY THE LAW.
Biden rules by tyrannical executive order…….OFTEN OUTSIDE THE LAWS OF CONGRESS.

Hello John… I see Chartster is ignoring your questions… If you don’t mind, I will provide answers…
1) Trump is a Zionist… Whenever a Zionist does something wrong, it is always blamed on Muslims, Palestinians, or Arabs.
2) Trump, a member of the uniparty, is a deep state shill… Looks like he’s against the deep state, but he’s controlled opposition… Just can’t upset the deep state by releasing that stuff… Cannot criticize the deep state bioweapon either…
3) Chartster is of the same ilk as Trump… Follow me, Q-con… I will help save you. Lol. 😆

Bobby M…. said Zimmy land is the worst place to invest in a gold mine…. 🙂

…but no surprise…our gooberment,rulers and hollyweird are completely corrupt, perverted and evil…

I bet……. Barry and Mike are on the tapes…. alone with just about everyone with 20 yrs. or more in Congress….and affiliated offices…