Minimize

Welcome!

Silver Tiger Metals – Visually Unpacking The El Tigre Project Underground PEA

Shad Marquitz
January 21, 2026

 

 

Glenn Jessome, President & CEO of Silver Tiger Metals (TSX.V:SLVR) (OTCQX:SLVTF), joins me for a special video segment which visually unpacks the key metrics, maps, and forward-looking plan for the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the underground mining second phase of the El Tigre Project.   We also review what the combined El Tigre Silver-Gold Project in Sonora, Mexico looks like on a valuation standpoint, when one sees the first phase surface mining stockwork zone in tandem with the underground second phase.

 

 

The bolt-on PEA is centered on the underground mining economics of the high-grade El Tigre, Sulphide, Black Shale and Seitz Kelly zones. The PEA mine design can be constructed independently of the Stockwork Zone development and is focused on the underground Mineral Resource. Prospective areas exist outside of the areas defined by the PEA and PFS with the historic “El Tigre North Mine” Mineral Resource located 700 metres to the North.

 

Highlights of the PEA , with a base case silver price of $38/oz and gold price of $3,200/oz are as follows (all figures in US dollars unless otherwise stated):

 

  • After-Tax net present value (“NPV”) (using a discount rate of 5%) of $304 million with an After-Tax IRR of 42.8% and Payback Period of 2.6 years (Base Case);
  • 15-year UG mine life with 3-year historical tailings processing recovering a total of 38 million payable silver equivalent ounces (“AgEq”) or 453 thousand gold equivalent ounces (“AuEq”), consisting of 34 million silver ounces and 130 thousand gold ounces;
  • Total Project undiscounted after-tax cash flow of $496 million;
  • Initial capital costs of $83.5 million, including $10.9 million in contingency costs, over an expected 18-month build, and sustaining capital costs of $213 million over the life of mine (“LOM”);
  • The 2026 PEA mine plan is designed as stand-alone to the PFS, with a potential overlap of initial capital cost of $17M (e.g., grid power, offices);
  • Average LOM operating cash costs of $1,351/oz AuEq, and all in sustaining costs (“AISC”) of $2,019/oz AuEq or Average LOM operating cash costs of $16.05/oz AgEq, and AISC of $23.98/oz AgEq;
  • Average annual production of approximately 2.3 million AgEq oz or 27.8 thousand AuEq oz, consisting of 2.1 million silver ounces and 8.0 thousand gold ounces (refer to Table 10 footnotes for conversion to Eq ozs); and
  • PEA Study of the Southern Veins does not include the 38 million ounces AgEq contained in the Northern Veins (see details in updated Mineral Resource Estimate below).

 

We also go on to unpack all the #exploration upside still at surface, in the underground, and along the district-scale mineralized trend of a number of historic past-producing mines that will have drill programs for many years into the future.

 

If you have any follow up questions for Glenn regarding Silver Tiger Metals, then please email them into me at Shad@kereport.com.

 

  • In full disclosure, Shad is a shareholder of Silver Tiger Metals at the time of this recording, and may choose to buy or sell shares at any time. 

 

 

For more market commentary & interview summaries, subscribe to our Substacks:

 

The KE Report: https://kereport.substack.com/

Shad’s resource market commentary: https://excelsiorprosperity.substack.com/

 

 

Investment disclaimer:

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Investing in equities and commodities involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Guests and hosts may own shares in companies mentioned.

 

 

Click here to follow the latest news from Silver Tiger Metals

Discussion
3 Comments
    11 hours ago

    Silver Tiger was ranked #13 out of the Top 50 Stocks on the OTCQX for this year’s awards:

    https://www.otcmarkets.com/corporate-services/otcqx-best-50

    Reply
      10 hours ago

      It is quite impressive how many names out of the 50 were mining stocks on that list above!

      Over half of the 50 stocks were gold, silver, copper, and critical minerals stocks, and they were competing against all of the broad market sectors with OTCQX listings (tech, fintech, biotech, healthcare, financials, retail, etc….)

      It just demonstrates how the mining sector dominated the results looking back at 2025.

      Reply
      8 hours ago

      HydroGraph (HGRAF) should have been at the top of that list but it is nowhere to be found! It shows you that even these people have their biases. That is why it is important to do your own Due Diligence. DT

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *