West Red Lake Gold – Diving Into The Positive Reconciliation Results Of The Bulk Sample Program
Gwen Preston, VP of Communication at West Red Lake Gold Mines (TSX.V:WRLG – OTCQB:WRLGF), joins me to review the news out earlier today that announced the positive reconciliation results from the bulk sample program at its 100% owned Madsen Mine located in the Red Lake Gold District of Northwestern Ontario, Canada.
The bulk sample included material from three main resource zones at Madsen – Austin, South Austin, and McVeigh – and followed the workflow and methodology to be implemented during regular mine operations.
Highlights of the bulk sample initiative:
- The bulk sample carried an average grade of 5.72 grams per tonne (“g/t”) gold (“Au”), 0.7% above the average predicted grade of 5.68 g/t Au for six stopes across three areas.
- 14,490 tonnes of bulk sample produced 2,498 ounces of gold
- Gold recovery in the Madsen Mill averaged 95%
Gwen reviewed that this close reconciliation between predicted and actual grades and tonnages highlights the effectiveness of definition drilling and detailed stope design in informing accurate modelling of gold mineralization. The fact that the estimated grade from their stope design and actual gold recoveries align almost exactly with expectations, really validates all the geological and engineering work the West Red Lake Gold Mine teams have been doing for the last 6 months. This bulk sample has demonstrated that their strategy is sound for estimating expected grades, recoveries, and that they can unlock value by moving the Madsen Mine back into production.
Next we discussed that the current stope design has changed from a cut and fill method to a long hole stoping approach, in order to maximize the economic benefit in today’s high gold price environment. This approach differs from the Prefeasibility Study (“PFS”), which used a gold price of US$1,680 per ounce when designing stopes, and instead is now using a long-term consensus gold price of US$2,350 per oz. which allows for mining the halo of lower-grade mineralization around the higher-grade tonnes. This long hole stoping mining method will allow for mining more overall gold ounces at Madsen, potentially lowering operational costs, increasing production, and enhancing overall economics relative to the PFS mine plan.
Wrapping up we reviewed that the company will be getting paid for the 2,498 ounces of gold produced in this bulk sample work program, and so those revenues combined with the $12.5 million left undrawn in the Nebari Natural Resources Credit Fund facility will have the company cashed up to proceed towards production in the near future.
If you have any follow up questions for Gwen or the team over at West Red Lake Gold, then please email me at Shad@kereport.com.
- In full disclosure, Shad is shareholder of West Red Lake Gold Mines at the time of this recording.
Click here to follow the latest news from West Red Lake Gold Mines
Thanks, Shad. I bought some WRLGF@ .49 last week and this is good news. I don’t know why the stock hasn’t jumped on this news, so I just bought more@.50. and hope to make as much on this as I did on Campbell Red Lake Mines long ago. How far is Campbell Red Lake from Western Red Lake? What do you think of the exploration prospects to expand the reserves here?
Hi there Bonzo. Yeah, I’m not sure exactly why WRLG hasn’t jumped more on this news as it was a critical milestone to move the Madsen Mine back into production, and the company delivered on every one of their commitments and their strategy worked precisely as expected for the reconciliation of grades and recoveries.
I get that there are still a lot of haters and doubters of this asset, but despite on the hand-wringing and concerns of how the prior operator Pure Gold did at Madsen, it is clear that the team at West Red Lake Gold Mines is taking a much more informed and experienced approach at pulling from multiple mining areas (not just McVeigh, but also Austin and South Austin… and eventually from North Austin). They also spent a lot of time figuring out the best ways to limit ore dilution, but still capitalize on grabbing the halo mineralization around high-grade areas using the long hole stoping method versus cut and fill.
By all accounts the WRLG is doing this mine restart at Madsen the right way and has an 18-month inventory of material built up, with better controls, and they are running the mill correctly (which the Pure Gold team was not doing most of those things). Bottom line, it is going to be a night and day experience, and when they ramp up mining and production in the 2nd half of the year to declare commercial production by year-end, and then show the market their grade/recoveries/production/revenues in Q1 and Q2, it should silence the remaining doubters and stone throwers.
This bulk sample should have been a shot across the bow at how this mine is going to work and that everyone’s low-ball valuations need to be adjusted higher, but trust takes a while to build. My biased view, as a shareholder, is that the stock should have rallied double-digits on the bulk sample results news yesterday, but it was actually down yesterday only up mildly today.
Then today they have news out that already made US$7.7 million and there is still a small remaining portion of gold they are waiting on getting paid on. So let’s say it’s around $8 million . That should be another clue that this mine is going to be quite profitable and they just stocked up the treasury to get them into a production decision for June to start the revenue generation process. They also still have the $12.5 million in undrawn funds from the Nebari credit facility, so they don’t need to raise any more cash, despite of flurry of uninformed calls from the retail peanut gallery that they might need to.
As for the exploration upside beyond the reserves, that is the most exciting part. We aren’t even talking about how easy it would be to keep beefing up the Fork deposit, where they can drift over to that in about 2-3 months as another area of growth, or the Upper 8 target, or the 8-zone at depth, or all the surface targets like North Shore, MJ, or North Venus. Additionally, there is all the exploration upside at their nearby 2nd satellite project Rowan that has substantially more upside. It is the exploration upside at Madsen and Rowan that I believe could take this from a large Tier 3 / small Tier 2 deposit, up to a potential Tier 1 deposit like their neighbors at the Red Lake Gold Mine operated currently by Evolution Mining. That is where the future growth and opportunity is at, and the market isn’t even properly valuing what they already have delineated, much less the prospectivity for resource expansion at all those targets just discussed.
There was a computer program selling WRLG all day for 70 cents, in 500 share increments, only in the last
five minutes did it stop and abort the final shares to drop the price to 69 cents CDN. I think there must have been a hedge fund needing money. Anyway, I was scooping up the old Poor Gold mining shares, I felt like I was running a gold dredge operation in the Bering Sea off Alaska. LOL! DT 🤣🤣🤣
Hi Ex, this news release is a game changer, I’m sure you are aware of it but just thought I would post it anyway: DT
Ivanhoe’s Mining Crews Have Entered the Giant Flatreef Platinum-Palladium-Rhodium-Nickel-Gold-Copper Orebody After 30 Years of Efforts
Yes indeed DT. That is big news for Ivanhoe, (and big new for Wheaton PM as they hold a stream on that project). Nice to see it FINALLY going into production.
Mining News Update In Portfolio Positions – DV, WRLG, DRY
Excelsior Prosperity w/ Shad Marquitz (05-08-2025)
https://excelsiorprosperity.substack.com/p/mining-news-update-in-portfolio-positions